Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Machine Learning - REOrdering Patches Improves Vision Models
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Machine Learning - REOrdering Patches Improves Vision Models
Alright Learning Crew, Ernis here, ready to dive into some seriously cool research! Today, we're cracking open a paper that asks a deceptively simple question: Does the order in which you show a computer an image really matter?
Now, you might be thinking, "Ernis, a picture is a picture, right? Doesn't matter how you look at it." And for a human, that's mostly true. But for computers, especially when they're using something called a transformer – think of it as a super-smart pattern-recognizing machine – the answer is a resounding YES!
Here’s the deal: these transformers, which are used for everything from understanding language to recognizing images, need to see information as a sequence, like a line of text. So, when you show a computer an image, you have to unfold it into a line of “patches,” like taking a quilt and cutting it into squares, then lining them up. The standard way to do this is like reading a book, left to right, top to bottom – what they call row-major order or raster scan.
But here’s the kicker. While the ideal transformer should be able to handle any order, the real-world transformers we use often have shortcuts built in to make them faster and more efficient. And these shortcuts can make them sensitive to the order in which they see those patches.
Think of it like this: imagine trying to assemble a puzzle, but the instructions only tell you to start with the top-left piece and work your way across. You could assemble it that way, but what if starting with a different piece, or grouping pieces by color, made the whole process much easier?
This paper shows that patch order really affects how well these transformers work! They found that just switching to a different order, like reading the image column by column instead of row by row, or using a fancy pattern called a Hilbert curve, could significantly change how accurately the computer recognized the image.
"Patch order significantly affects model performance...with simple alternatives...yielding notable accuracy shifts."
So, what can we do about it? The researchers came up with a clever solution called REOrder. It's like a two-step recipe for finding the best patch order for a specific task.
Here's how it works:
Step 1: Information Detective Work: They start by figuring out which patch sequences are the most "informative." They do this by seeing how well they can compress each sequence. The idea is that a sequence that's easy to compress probably has a lot of redundancy, while a sequence that's hard to compress is packed with useful information.
Step 2: Learning to Reorder: Then, they use a technique called REINFORCE (a type of reinforcement learning) to train a "policy" that learns to rearrange the patches in the best possible order. It's like teaching a robot to sort puzzle pieces in a way that makes it easiest to solve the puzzle.
And guess what? It works! They tested REOrder on some tough image recognition tasks, like ImageNet-1K (a huge collection of images) and Functional Map of the World (which involves recognizing objects in satellite images). They saw significant improvements in accuracy compared to the standard row-major ordering – up to 3% on ImageNet and a whopping 13% on the satellite images!
So, why does this matter? Well, it's important for a few reasons:
For researchers: It highlights the importance of considering patch order when designing and training vision transformers. It also provides a new tool for optimizing these models for specific tasks.
For practitioners: It suggests that simply changing the patch order can lead to significant performance gains without requiring any changes to the model architecture or training data. That's like free performance!
For everyone: It reminds us that even seemingly trivial details, like the order in which we present information to a computer, can have a big impact on its performance. It’s another reminder that AI is a complex field and we still have a lot to learn!
Think about it! If patch order matters this much for image recognition, what other seemingly arbitrary choices might be affecting the performance of other AI systems? Could this approach be applied to other types of sequential data, like time series or even text?
This research really opens up some interesting questions. For example, could a dynamically changing patch order during training be even more effective? And how does the optimal patch order change as the model learns?
That's all for today, Learning Crew! I hope you found this paper as fascinating as I did. Until next time, keep exploring!
Credit to Paper authors: Declan Kutscher, David M. Chan, Yutong Bai, Trevor Darrell, Ritwik Gupta
View all episodes
By ernestasposkusAlright Learning Crew, Ernis here, ready to dive into some seriously cool research! Today, we're cracking open a paper that asks a deceptively simple question: Does the order in which you show a computer an image really matter?
Now, you might be thinking, "Ernis, a picture is a picture, right? Doesn't matter how you look at it." And for a human, that's mostly true. But for computers, especially when they're using something called a transformer – think of it as a super-smart pattern-recognizing machine – the answer is a resounding YES!
Here’s the deal: these transformers, which are used for everything from understanding language to recognizing images, need to see information as a sequence, like a line of text. So, when you show a computer an image, you have to unfold it into a line of “patches,” like taking a quilt and cutting it into squares, then lining them up. The standard way to do this is like reading a book, left to right, top to bottom – what they call row-major order or raster scan.
But here’s the kicker. While the ideal transformer should be able to handle any order, the real-world transformers we use often have shortcuts built in to make them faster and more efficient. And these shortcuts can make them sensitive to the order in which they see those patches.
Think of it like this: imagine trying to assemble a puzzle, but the instructions only tell you to start with the top-left piece and work your way across. You could assemble it that way, but what if starting with a different piece, or grouping pieces by color, made the whole process much easier?
This paper shows that patch order really affects how well these transformers work! They found that just switching to a different order, like reading the image column by column instead of row by row, or using a fancy pattern called a Hilbert curve, could significantly change how accurately the computer recognized the image.
"Patch order significantly affects model performance...with simple alternatives...yielding notable accuracy shifts."
So, what can we do about it? The researchers came up with a clever solution called REOrder. It's like a two-step recipe for finding the best patch order for a specific task.
Here's how it works:
Step 1: Information Detective Work: They start by figuring out which patch sequences are the most "informative." They do this by seeing how well they can compress each sequence. The idea is that a sequence that's easy to compress probably has a lot of redundancy, while a sequence that's hard to compress is packed with useful information.
Step 2: Learning to Reorder: Then, they use a technique called REINFORCE (a type of reinforcement learning) to train a "policy" that learns to rearrange the patches in the best possible order. It's like teaching a robot to sort puzzle pieces in a way that makes it easiest to solve the puzzle.
And guess what? It works! They tested REOrder on some tough image recognition tasks, like ImageNet-1K (a huge collection of images) and Functional Map of the World (which involves recognizing objects in satellite images). They saw significant improvements in accuracy compared to the standard row-major ordering – up to 3% on ImageNet and a whopping 13% on the satellite images!
So, why does this matter? Well, it's important for a few reasons:
For researchers: It highlights the importance of considering patch order when designing and training vision transformers. It also provides a new tool for optimizing these models for specific tasks.
For practitioners: It suggests that simply changing the patch order can lead to significant performance gains without requiring any changes to the model architecture or training data. That's like free performance!
For everyone: It reminds us that even seemingly trivial details, like the order in which we present information to a computer, can have a big impact on its performance. It’s another reminder that AI is a complex field and we still have a lot to learn!
Think about it! If patch order matters this much for image recognition, what other seemingly arbitrary choices might be affecting the performance of other AI systems? Could this approach be applied to other types of sequential data, like time series or even text?
This research really opens up some interesting questions. For example, could a dynamically changing patch order during training be even more effective? And how does the optimal patch order change as the model learns?
That's all for today, Learning Crew! I hope you found this paper as fascinating as I did. Until next time, keep exploring!
Credit to Paper authors: Declan Kutscher, David M. Chan, Yutong Bai, Trevor Darrell, Ritwik Gupta