According to industry eDiscovery and search experts Dr. William Webber and John Tredennick, they think the search-then-synthesize method is a valid approach to search and question answering on eDiscovery collections and indeed have developed a prototype themselves. In this case, “hallucinations” are less of an issue, because GPT is directly being presented with the documents (sources) on which to base its answers, and the user is able to check those answers against the sources.  

The post Magic and Hallucinations? Considering ChatGPT in eDiscovery appeared first on ComplexDiscovery.