On November 8, 2022, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. At issue is whether a state can require corporations to consent to personal jurisdiction in order to do business in the state, or whether such a requirement violates the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.<br /><br />Tune in to hear from Prof. Christopher R. Green, a leading scholar on the 14th Amendment and constitutional law from the University of Mississippi School of Law.

On November 8, 2022, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. At issue is whether a state can require corporations to consent to personal jurisdiction in order to do business in the state, or whether such a requirement violates the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.Tune in to hear from Prof. Christopher R. Green, a leading scholar on the 14th Amendment and constitutional law from the University of Mississippi School of Law.

On November 8, 2022, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. At issue is whether a state can require corporations to consent to personal jurisdiction in order to do business in the state, or whether such a requirement violates the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.<br><br>Tune in to hear from Prof. Christopher R. Green, a leading scholar on the 14th Amendment and constitutional law from the University of Mississippi School of Law.

Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at <a href="http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast" rel="noopener">http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast</a>

News

Politics

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast

SCOTUScast is a project of the Federalist Society for Law &amp; Public Policy Studies. This audio broadcast series provides expert commentary on U.S. Supreme Court cases as they are argued and issued. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker. We hope these broadcasts, like all of our programming, will serve to stimulate discussion and further exchange regarding important current legal issues. View our entire SCOTUScast archive at <a href="http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.federalistsociety.org/SCOTUScast</a>

Share Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Sign up to save your podcasts

Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

More shows like SCOTUScast

FedSoc Events

FedSoc Forums

Faculty Division Bookshelf

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Necessary & Proper Podcast

Uncommon Knowledge

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

Camano Chapel Podcast