
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
IZt’s not where archaeologists expected to find a boomerang. And certainly not one carved from a mammoth tusk.
In the chill shadows of Obłazowa Cave in southern Poland, beneath layers of Pleistocene debris and calcified history, a curved artifact was unearthed in the 1990s. Carved with care from the tusk of Mammuthus primigenius, the ivory tool looked vaguely familiar to modern eyes. Roughly 72 centimeters long, slightly asymmetrical, with one rounded end and subtle incised grooves for grip—its function became obvious when a replica was thrown. It flew straight and true, though it did not return. Like some Aboriginal Australian hunting boomerangs, this one was built for striking, not circling back.
What puzzled researchers most was its age. Initially dated to 18,000 years ago, the boomerang already stood out as one of the oldest non-returning examples known. But a team led by Sahra Talamo at the University of Bologna has now revised that estimate. Drawing on radiocarbon samples from the same stratigraphic layer of the cave—notably 13 animal bones and a human thumb—their analysis pushes the date of the artifact back to roughly 40,000 years ago. That not only makes it much older than previously thought, but also situates it in a critical and poorly understood moment of European prehistory.
“This boomerang reflects a unique choice by the group at Obłazowa Cave,” the team wrote. The decision to carve such a specialized tool from mammoth ivory, despite the labor and time involved, hints at something deeper than simple utility.
Artifacts of the Cold Steppe
The updated chronology places the boomerang in a time of profound climatic stress. After about 42,000 years ago, a cascade of environmental changes swept through central Europe. Permafrost crept south, and the steppe turned to tundra. Much of northern Europe became increasingly inhospitable. Yet at Obłazowa, humans persisted.
“Environmental shifts after 42,000 years ago, associated with central European climatic deterioration, positioned the cold-steppe landscapes north of 49 degrees North as challenging for sustained settlements,” Talamo and colleagues explain.
Obłazowa Cave offers a counternarrative. The site shows evidence of occupation lasting more than three millennia through this bitter climatic window. Tools, ornaments, hunting debris—and now the boomerang—suggest that small human groups not only survived but thrived here. The ivory implement, shaped and incised with decorative grooves filled in with red pigment, was as much a statement as a tool.
And it was found not in isolation. Nearby were worked antlers, pendants fashioned from arctic fox teeth, a bone bead—and a single human thumb bone.
“The boulders appear to have been transported from the nearby river and intentionally placed,” the team writes, suggesting a ritual context. Whether these arrangements reflect burial, hunting magic, or something unknowable is uncertain. But they point to meaning beyond the practical.
Ivory and Intent
Working mammoth ivory is no small feat. Unlike wood or bone, it requires intensive labor to cut, shave, and shape. Tusks from female mammoths could reach 9 centimeters in diameter; males twice that. To sculpt a thin aerodynamic boomerang from such material meant removing massive quantities of ivory, smoothing it into a flight-worthy arc, and engraving it with deliberate care.
This wasn’t expedient technology. It was a piece made to last—and perhaps, to communicate.
The red pigment embedded in its incised lines was almost certainly added intentionally. Whether symbolic, ritualistic, or aesthetic, the decoration suggests that form and meaning were as important as function.
“We now have strong evidence that Upper Paleolithic humans in central Europe weren’t just surviving—they were expressing, transmitting, and embodying complex cultural practices,” says Talamo.
The boomerang’s resemblance to Australian Aboriginal designs is likely a coincidence of convergent innovation. Humans across continents have repeatedly arrived at similar solutions to the age-old problem of hitting something at a distance. But what makes this artifact exceptional is its context: mammoth ivory used for a projectile weapon, carved at the cusp of the Last Glacial Maximum in a cave full of other symbolic objects.
Hunters, Rituals, and Resilience
Was this object used for hunting, display, or both? That remains unclear. But its presence in Obłazowa Cave underscores the resourcefulness—and resilience—of Upper Paleolithic communities. These were people who faced hostile climates, sparse prey, and fleeting seasons. Yet they made time for meticulous craftsmanship, symbolic expression, and perhaps even ritual ceremony.
Their material culture doesn’t just tell a story of hardship. It tells a story of adaptation, persistence, and the human need to mark meaning into the world—even when the world turns to ice.
Suggested Related Research
* Riede, F. (2009). “The loss and re-introduction of bow-and-arrow technology: A case study from the Southern Scandinavian Late Paleolithic.” Antiquity, 83(322), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00098261
* Vanhaeren, M., & d’Errico, F. (2006). “Aurignacian ethno-linguistic geography of Europe revealed by personal ornaments.” Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(8), 1105–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.11.017
* Osborn, A. J., & Motz, C. J. (2009). “Projectile Technology and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility: Experimental Results from a High Altitude Rocky Mountain Setting.” American Antiquity, 74(3), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600038641
* Pettitt, P. (2011). The Palaeolithic Origins of Human Burial. Routledge.
IZt’s not where archaeologists expected to find a boomerang. And certainly not one carved from a mammoth tusk.
In the chill shadows of Obłazowa Cave in southern Poland, beneath layers of Pleistocene debris and calcified history, a curved artifact was unearthed in the 1990s. Carved with care from the tusk of Mammuthus primigenius, the ivory tool looked vaguely familiar to modern eyes. Roughly 72 centimeters long, slightly asymmetrical, with one rounded end and subtle incised grooves for grip—its function became obvious when a replica was thrown. It flew straight and true, though it did not return. Like some Aboriginal Australian hunting boomerangs, this one was built for striking, not circling back.
What puzzled researchers most was its age. Initially dated to 18,000 years ago, the boomerang already stood out as one of the oldest non-returning examples known. But a team led by Sahra Talamo at the University of Bologna has now revised that estimate. Drawing on radiocarbon samples from the same stratigraphic layer of the cave—notably 13 animal bones and a human thumb—their analysis pushes the date of the artifact back to roughly 40,000 years ago. That not only makes it much older than previously thought, but also situates it in a critical and poorly understood moment of European prehistory.
“This boomerang reflects a unique choice by the group at Obłazowa Cave,” the team wrote. The decision to carve such a specialized tool from mammoth ivory, despite the labor and time involved, hints at something deeper than simple utility.
Artifacts of the Cold Steppe
The updated chronology places the boomerang in a time of profound climatic stress. After about 42,000 years ago, a cascade of environmental changes swept through central Europe. Permafrost crept south, and the steppe turned to tundra. Much of northern Europe became increasingly inhospitable. Yet at Obłazowa, humans persisted.
“Environmental shifts after 42,000 years ago, associated with central European climatic deterioration, positioned the cold-steppe landscapes north of 49 degrees North as challenging for sustained settlements,” Talamo and colleagues explain.
Obłazowa Cave offers a counternarrative. The site shows evidence of occupation lasting more than three millennia through this bitter climatic window. Tools, ornaments, hunting debris—and now the boomerang—suggest that small human groups not only survived but thrived here. The ivory implement, shaped and incised with decorative grooves filled in with red pigment, was as much a statement as a tool.
And it was found not in isolation. Nearby were worked antlers, pendants fashioned from arctic fox teeth, a bone bead—and a single human thumb bone.
“The boulders appear to have been transported from the nearby river and intentionally placed,” the team writes, suggesting a ritual context. Whether these arrangements reflect burial, hunting magic, or something unknowable is uncertain. But they point to meaning beyond the practical.
Ivory and Intent
Working mammoth ivory is no small feat. Unlike wood or bone, it requires intensive labor to cut, shave, and shape. Tusks from female mammoths could reach 9 centimeters in diameter; males twice that. To sculpt a thin aerodynamic boomerang from such material meant removing massive quantities of ivory, smoothing it into a flight-worthy arc, and engraving it with deliberate care.
This wasn’t expedient technology. It was a piece made to last—and perhaps, to communicate.
The red pigment embedded in its incised lines was almost certainly added intentionally. Whether symbolic, ritualistic, or aesthetic, the decoration suggests that form and meaning were as important as function.
“We now have strong evidence that Upper Paleolithic humans in central Europe weren’t just surviving—they were expressing, transmitting, and embodying complex cultural practices,” says Talamo.
The boomerang’s resemblance to Australian Aboriginal designs is likely a coincidence of convergent innovation. Humans across continents have repeatedly arrived at similar solutions to the age-old problem of hitting something at a distance. But what makes this artifact exceptional is its context: mammoth ivory used for a projectile weapon, carved at the cusp of the Last Glacial Maximum in a cave full of other symbolic objects.
Hunters, Rituals, and Resilience
Was this object used for hunting, display, or both? That remains unclear. But its presence in Obłazowa Cave underscores the resourcefulness—and resilience—of Upper Paleolithic communities. These were people who faced hostile climates, sparse prey, and fleeting seasons. Yet they made time for meticulous craftsmanship, symbolic expression, and perhaps even ritual ceremony.
Their material culture doesn’t just tell a story of hardship. It tells a story of adaptation, persistence, and the human need to mark meaning into the world—even when the world turns to ice.
Suggested Related Research
* Riede, F. (2009). “The loss and re-introduction of bow-and-arrow technology: A case study from the Southern Scandinavian Late Paleolithic.” Antiquity, 83(322), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00098261
* Vanhaeren, M., & d’Errico, F. (2006). “Aurignacian ethno-linguistic geography of Europe revealed by personal ornaments.” Journal of Archaeological Science, 33(8), 1105–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.11.017
* Osborn, A. J., & Motz, C. J. (2009). “Projectile Technology and Hunter-Gatherer Mobility: Experimental Results from a High Altitude Rocky Mountain Setting.” American Antiquity, 74(3), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002731600038641
* Pettitt, P. (2011). The Palaeolithic Origins of Human Burial. Routledge.