Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Mandatory Minimums: Why Federal Sentences Can Be So Harsh
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Mandatory Minimums: Why Federal Sentences Can Be So Harsh
Episode Summary
In this episode of Criminal Law Unfiltered, defense attorney Robert M. Helfend explains the complexities of mandatory minimum sentences in federal court. He breaks down how these laws remove judicial discretion, why prosecutors hold the power to determine sentencing exposure, and what options exist for clients facing mandatory terms. With more than 40 years of experience handling serious state and federal cases, Robert sheds light on sentencing guidelines, the “safety valve” provision, cooperation agreements, and the strategies that can help reduce prison time in the federal system.
Key Timestamps
01:15 – What are mandatory minimum sentences and who sets them?
04:30 – Why judges cannot go below mandatory minimums
06:20 – Federal sentencing guidelines and how they interact with mandatory minimums
08:45 – The “safety valve” provision and when it applies
11:15 – Cooperation with prosecutors and sentence reductions
14:30 – Risks and stigma of cooperating in federal cases
18:20 – Why professionalism and credibility matter when negotiating with prosecutors
22:00 – Options for clients starting a mandatory minimum sentence
23:15 – Advocating for reform and eliminating mandatory minimums
About the Show:
Criminal Law Unfiltered is hosted by Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Robert M. Helfend, founder of Helfend Law Group. With decades of courtroom experience in serious state and federal cases, Robert provides unfiltered insights into how the justice system really works. Each episode sheds light on the realities of criminal defense, separating TV fiction from the truth inside the courtroom.
Resources:
View all episodes
By criminallawunfilteredEpisode Summary
In this episode of Criminal Law Unfiltered, defense attorney Robert M. Helfend explains the complexities of mandatory minimum sentences in federal court. He breaks down how these laws remove judicial discretion, why prosecutors hold the power to determine sentencing exposure, and what options exist for clients facing mandatory terms. With more than 40 years of experience handling serious state and federal cases, Robert sheds light on sentencing guidelines, the “safety valve” provision, cooperation agreements, and the strategies that can help reduce prison time in the federal system.
Key Timestamps
01:15 – What are mandatory minimum sentences and who sets them?
04:30 – Why judges cannot go below mandatory minimums
06:20 – Federal sentencing guidelines and how they interact with mandatory minimums
08:45 – The “safety valve” provision and when it applies
11:15 – Cooperation with prosecutors and sentence reductions
14:30 – Risks and stigma of cooperating in federal cases
18:20 – Why professionalism and credibility matter when negotiating with prosecutors
22:00 – Options for clients starting a mandatory minimum sentence
23:15 – Advocating for reform and eliminating mandatory minimums
About the Show:
Criminal Law Unfiltered is hosted by Los Angeles criminal defense attorney Robert M. Helfend, founder of Helfend Law Group. With decades of courtroom experience in serious state and federal cases, Robert provides unfiltered insights into how the justice system really works. Each episode sheds light on the realities of criminal defense, separating TV fiction from the truth inside the courtroom.
Resources: