Most OT security programs look solid on paper.

Audits are passed. Pen test reports are filed. Patch cycles are on schedule.

But here is the uncomfortable question: If an attacker moved from IT into your OT environment tonight, would you see it? Would your security team detect it before operations noticed something wrong on the plant floor?

And if you did detect it, could you contain the threat without shutting down production?

Today’s session is called Aligning OT Security With How Attacks Really Unfold. It is built around a simple reality: most security programs are aligned to reports and compliance frameworks, not to how adversaries actually move through industrial environments.

In this webinar, we will break down the lessons from a real modern industrial incident and show where the confidence gap exists between passing security tests and surviving a real attack.

Joining the discussion today are two experts who see this problem from both sides. Terry McCorkle, CEO and Founder of PhishCloud, brings the offensive perspective. Terry works with executive leadership and boards to understand how attackers actually pivot from IT into OT environments and where visibility typically fails. And Chris Weule, Director of Operational Technology, Cyber Fusion and Strategy, brings the defense and operations perspective. Chris has deep hands on experience modeling adversary behavior in industrial environments and helping organizations validate detection, response, and coordination without disrupting production.

Together they will walk through:

• What really happened in the recent Poland grid incident
• Why traditional audits and pen tests often miss the most dangerous gaps
• And why OT security maturity is not declared in reports

Let’s get into it.