
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Eleventh Circuit's decision, holding that: (1) the law enforcement proviso in the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) overrides only the intentional-tort exception in §2680(h), not the discretionary-function exception or other exceptions throughout §2680; and (2) the Supremacy Clause does not afford the United States a defense in FTCA suits. The Court directed the Eleventh Circuit to reconsider whether the discretionary-function exception bars the plaintiffs' negligent or intentional tort claims without reference to its mistaken views.
music for the podcast provided by Dimitry Taras
By 9robes.aiThe Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Eleventh Circuit's decision, holding that: (1) the law enforcement proviso in the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) overrides only the intentional-tort exception in §2680(h), not the discretionary-function exception or other exceptions throughout §2680; and (2) the Supremacy Clause does not afford the United States a defense in FTCA suits. The Court directed the Eleventh Circuit to reconsider whether the discretionary-function exception bars the plaintiffs' negligent or intentional tort claims without reference to its mistaken views.
music for the podcast provided by Dimitry Taras