Episode 57. September 11, 2020

CLP Topic Category: Destruction of the Nation.

Title: Marxist Legal Theory and the Revenge Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse.

Our podcast today is titled Marxist Legal Theory and the Revenge Prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse, and places the arrest and prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse into the bigger framework of Marxist Critical Legal Theory that guides the behavior of the Marxist judges and prosecutors that Soros has funded.

We use the Rittenhouse event as an example in our analytical framework to describe the links between the BLM riots and funding from Soros, which is designed to end the American judicial system of individual natural rights.

Diagram 1. Analytical Model of Soros Political Influence.

In Marxist Critical Legal Theory, the concept of individual justice is replaced by the concept of group identity social justice. Rittenhouse is being prosecuted as a white supremacist, not as an individual citizen.

The Rittenhouse prosecution of first degree murder is based upon the false premise that Rittenhouse is guilty, before the fact, because he is deemed by Marxist prosecutors to be a white supremacist.

The premise of white supremacy is a tenet in Systemic Judicial Black Racism, a sub-category of Marxist Critical Legal Theory, promoted by state and local Marxist prosecutors who have been elected to office through funding by Soros, in order to seek revenge for slavery and systemic racism.

In the bigger picture, Soros prefers a global, one-world government, managed by elites, like himself. He believes that independent sovereign nation states are obsolete, and should be replaced by a unified totalitarian global government.

In order to replace sovereign nation states, Soros believes that the concept of “individual rights” is archaic, and should be replaced by group collectivism, similar to the social structure of Communist China.

Soros derives his anti-individual, globalist philosophy from his interpretation of Karl Popper’s work on skepticism and rationalism. 

Soros’ interpretation of Popper is terribly flawed and contains an irreconcilable philosophical contradiction, related to Popper’s concept of the “open society.”

We explain that Soros’ misinterpretation of Popper allows him to promote Marxist Critical Legal Theory, the antithesis of Popper’s theory of the open society.

Soros’ interpretation of Popper’s open society is ass-backwards. He is so morally arrogant as to believe that he, himself, has the sole moral authority to overturn the American individualist principles of Hobbes and Locke.

Soros’ one-man crusade to eradicate American individualism is fueled by his $24 billion of family wealth, which he directs to pursue his phantom philosophical goals of a one-world government.

A much better philosophical fit for Soros’ moral arrogance is Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s explanation of the will to power. In this context, the Soros attempt to impose his model of human society on American citizens, is through the strength of his personality and the use of his wealth.

Following Nietzsche, Soros is obsessed with his individual creative powers to overcome the social, cultural and moral defects that he perceives in American individualism, in pursuit of his global collectivist values.

Soros’ pursuit of the untried and empirically untested globalist vision is a profound misstatement of Popper’s philosophy of scientific truth through falsification. Soros’ one-man effort to create a global collectivist society can neither be falsified, via Popper, nor tested, via scientific rationalism.

The actions of Marxist prosecutors in America, elected by funding from Soros, contradict every tenet of Popper’s open society.

For common citizens, there is no exit from the perpetual straight jacket tyranny of global Marxism, which is the ultimate goal of a faux dictator, like Soros. Once the Marxists gain power, there will no longer be a democratic concept of “consent of the governed,” to deploy in order to escap