Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share "Maybe Logic”: “You can’t BS the BS-er! - A Deeper look at limitations on certainty and Robert Anton’s thoughts on the Illusion of Is-ness”
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
"Maybe Logic”: “You can’t BS the BS-er! - A Deeper look at limitations on certainty and Robert Anton’s thoughts on the Illusion of Is-ness”
“Everybody abstracts a different reality. When you come through a room, you abstract the reality you’re prepared to abstract. You pick up the signals that interest you. Your brain records them and organizes them.” “We all have our own reality tunnel, and in our reality tunnel we pick out some things and ignore other things. And we got 10 billion cells in our brain receiving hundreds and hundreds of millions of signals all the time. We just pick out the ones that fit into the established grooves in our brain, the reality tunnel that’s been laid down by past experience. We all have our own belief system, and the signals that fit our belief system get in. The signals that don’t fit our belief system get ignored, or if they keep coming back we go to a psychiatrist to get cured and make them go away.” "There is no 'official' Copenhagen interpretation. But every version grabs the bull by the horns and asserts that an observation produces the property observed. The tricky word here is 'observation.'... "The Copenhagen interpretation considers two realms: there is the macroscopic, classical realm of our measuring instruments governed by Newton's laws; and there is the microscopic, quantum realm of atoms and other small things governed by the Schrodinger equation. It argues that we never deal directly with the quantum objects of the microscopic realm. We therefore need not worry about their physical reality, or their lack of it. An 'existence' that allows the calculation of their effects on our macroscopic instruments is enough for us to consider." “Fear, pleasure, sorrow, thought and violence are all interrelated. Most of us take pleasure in violence, in disliking somebody…But in a state of mind in which all violence has come to an end there is a joy, which is very different from the pleasure of violence with its conflicts, hatred’s and fears.” - J. Krishnamurti: Violence—Anger—Justification and Condemnation—The Ideal and the Actual from the book “Freedom From the Known” Questions: Are most peoples “Truth”, i.e. “my truth“, just an inflexible deterministic version of revisionist history? Is right and wrong an illusion? What is self-integration/self-alignment, and it’s impact on aligning interpersonally? Can our unhealed wounds make us psychologically dogmatic? Is our perspective absolute truth? Are We Guilty of “Self Gaslighting” Why do I feel the need to be right all the time? Can the concept of right and wrong be seen as a construct created by human perception, rather than an absolute truth? How do our unhealed emotional wounds influence our psychological rigidity and the need to defend specific beliefs or perspectives? Is the idea of an absolute perspective merely an illusion, shaped by our individual reality tunnels and belief systems? To what extent do we engage in "self-gaslighting," disregarding signals that challenge our established belief systems? What drives the persistent need to be perceived as right in various interactions and discussions? How do the four types of illusion, as conceptualized by Robert Anton Wilson, influence our perception and interpretation of reality? Are concepts like 'right', 'wrong', 'good', and 'bad' subjective illusions, shaped by individual belief systems rather than objective truths? How does the notion of coming into relationships 'healed' perpetuate limitations in experiencing the fullness of 'isness' within healthy dynamics? What are some examples of propaganda related to the concept of healing and the eradication of emotional wounds? How does the pursuit of external validation and 'doing' rather than acceptance of the present moment hinder the attainment of 'isness' or being in the now? Can the search for safety lead to an adversarial nature in relationships, stemming from the quest for certainty in our partners? In what ways do we compromise genuine connections by seeking certainty from our partners as a means of feeling safe? Can our attachment to our own 'B.S.' create barriers to authentic connections, delaying our self-actualization and relational growth? How does detachment from our own 'B.S.' contribute to overcoming relational barriers and fostering authentic connections? What limitations hinder our understanding of 'is-ness' or 'being' when we solely embrace our own 'B.S.' as absolute truth? What are the 4 types of illusion? Are 'right', 'wrong', 'good', 'bad', and such concepts just illusions for human beings? Do they actually exist or is everything subjective? What is some propaganda surrounding healing and wound eradication? How does the idea that WIPs “come healed” limit their experience of “isness” or being within a healthy dynamic? What personality type thinks they are always right? Why is it not possible to achieve acceptance of the “now” from a space of “doing” and/or external validation seeking? How does seeking safety connect to the adversarial nature we develop in the process of becoming “certain” about our partners and relationships? Can the picking apart of our partners be (although not always intentional) merely a means to an end to achieve “safety”? In what ways do we incriminate ourselves by seeking the “certainty” we claim to need from our partners in order to be “safe”? Can attachment to your B.S. become a relational odor that repels authentic connections and thus delays self actualization? If so, how can detachment from your B.S. remedy this issue? What limitations arise in our understanding of “is-ness” or “being” when we accept only our B.S. as absolute truth? 1. How does Robert Anton Wilson's concept of "Maybe Logic" challenge traditional notions of absolute truth? 2. To what extent does the brain's selective abstraction of reality limit our perception of truth? 3. Can the idea of "is-ness" be reconciled with the ever-changing nature of reality as proposed by quantum physics? 4. How do different reality tunnels influence our interpretations of metaphysical concepts? 5. What are the psychological effects of living with the awareness that our perceptions might be illusions? 6. How does the acceptance of "Maybe Logic" affect our approach to philosophical and scientific inquiries? 7. Can acknowledging the illusion of certainty improve mental health outcomes in psychotherapy? 8. How do cultural and societal influences shape the reality tunnels we develop? 9. In what ways can the concept of "is-ness" be applied to enhance spiritual practices and experiences? 10. Does Maybe Logic imply that all forms of knowledge are inherently uncertain and subjective? 11. How can understanding our own cognitive biases help in deconstructing rigid belief systems? 12. What role does Maybe Logic play in addressing dogmatism within religious and spiritual contexts? 13. How might embracing uncertainty impact our relationships and communication with others? 14. Can the illusion of certainty be seen as a defense mechanism against existential anxiety? 15. How does Maybe Logic challenge the traditional binary of right and wrong in moral philosophy? 16. In what ways can Maybe Logic contribute to a more flexible and open-minded approach to learning? 17. How does the concept of Maybe Logic intersect with theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles? 18. What are the implications of Maybe Logic for the field of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)? 19. How can Maybe Logic inform our understanding of neuroplasticity and brain adaptability? 20. To what extent does Maybe Logic align with or contradict postmodernist views on truth and reality? 21. How can the practice of Maybe Logic enhance critical thinking skills in education? 22. What are the potential drawbacks of adopting a Maybe Logic mindset in decision-making processes? 23. How does Maybe Logic relate to the concept of mindfulness and present-moment awareness? 24. In what ways can Maybe Logic inform our understanding of identity and self-concept? 25. How does Maybe Logic impact our approach to conflict resolution and negotiation? 26. Can Maybe Logic help in developing more inclusive and diverse perspectives in social sciences? 27. How does Maybe Logic challenge the traditional narratives of history and historiography? 28. What are the ethical implications of applying Maybe Logic to moral and legal judgments? 29. How does the acceptance of Maybe Logic influence our perception of time and space in cosmology? 30. Can Maybe Logic be integrated into existential therapy to address the uncertainty of meaning and purpose? 31. How does Maybe Logic affect our understanding of consciousness and subjective experience? 32. What are the implications of Maybe Logic for artificial intelligence and machine learning? 33. How does Maybe Logic challenge conventional approaches to scientific research and methodology? 34. In what ways can Maybe Logic contribute to a more holistic understanding of human behavior and psychology? 35. How does Maybe Logic inform our understanding of paradoxes and contradictions in philosophy? 36. Can Maybe Logic provide a framework for reconciling conflicts between science and spirituality? 37. How does Maybe Logic impact our approach to ethics and moral reasoning in complex situations? 38. What are the potential benefits of incorporating Maybe Logic into organizational and leadership practices? 39. How does Maybe Logic influence our understanding of language and meaning in semiotics? 40. In what ways can Maybe Logic inform our approach to ecological and environmental issues? 41. How does Maybe Logic challenge the notion of fixed identities in gender and sexuality studies? 42. Can Maybe Logic help in developing more adaptive and resilient coping strategies for stress and trauma? 43. How does Maybe Logic relate to the concept of cognitive dissonance in psychology? 44. What are the implications of Maybe Logic for our understanding of creativity and innovation? 45. How does Maybe Logic inform our approach to education and pedag
View all episodes
By KBLA 1580 Am“Everybody abstracts a different reality. When you come through a room, you abstract the reality you’re prepared to abstract. You pick up the signals that interest you. Your brain records them and organizes them.” “We all have our own reality tunnel, and in our reality tunnel we pick out some things and ignore other things. And we got 10 billion cells in our brain receiving hundreds and hundreds of millions of signals all the time. We just pick out the ones that fit into the established grooves in our brain, the reality tunnel that’s been laid down by past experience. We all have our own belief system, and the signals that fit our belief system get in. The signals that don’t fit our belief system get ignored, or if they keep coming back we go to a psychiatrist to get cured and make them go away.” "There is no 'official' Copenhagen interpretation. But every version grabs the bull by the horns and asserts that an observation produces the property observed. The tricky word here is 'observation.'... "The Copenhagen interpretation considers two realms: there is the macroscopic, classical realm of our measuring instruments governed by Newton's laws; and there is the microscopic, quantum realm of atoms and other small things governed by the Schrodinger equation. It argues that we never deal directly with the quantum objects of the microscopic realm. We therefore need not worry about their physical reality, or their lack of it. An 'existence' that allows the calculation of their effects on our macroscopic instruments is enough for us to consider." “Fear, pleasure, sorrow, thought and violence are all interrelated. Most of us take pleasure in violence, in disliking somebody…But in a state of mind in which all violence has come to an end there is a joy, which is very different from the pleasure of violence with its conflicts, hatred’s and fears.” - J. Krishnamurti: Violence—Anger—Justification and Condemnation—The Ideal and the Actual from the book “Freedom From the Known” Questions: Are most peoples “Truth”, i.e. “my truth“, just an inflexible deterministic version of revisionist history? Is right and wrong an illusion? What is self-integration/self-alignment, and it’s impact on aligning interpersonally? Can our unhealed wounds make us psychologically dogmatic? Is our perspective absolute truth? Are We Guilty of “Self Gaslighting” Why do I feel the need to be right all the time? Can the concept of right and wrong be seen as a construct created by human perception, rather than an absolute truth? How do our unhealed emotional wounds influence our psychological rigidity and the need to defend specific beliefs or perspectives? Is the idea of an absolute perspective merely an illusion, shaped by our individual reality tunnels and belief systems? To what extent do we engage in "self-gaslighting," disregarding signals that challenge our established belief systems? What drives the persistent need to be perceived as right in various interactions and discussions? How do the four types of illusion, as conceptualized by Robert Anton Wilson, influence our perception and interpretation of reality? Are concepts like 'right', 'wrong', 'good', and 'bad' subjective illusions, shaped by individual belief systems rather than objective truths? How does the notion of coming into relationships 'healed' perpetuate limitations in experiencing the fullness of 'isness' within healthy dynamics? What are some examples of propaganda related to the concept of healing and the eradication of emotional wounds? How does the pursuit of external validation and 'doing' rather than acceptance of the present moment hinder the attainment of 'isness' or being in the now? Can the search for safety lead to an adversarial nature in relationships, stemming from the quest for certainty in our partners? In what ways do we compromise genuine connections by seeking certainty from our partners as a means of feeling safe? Can our attachment to our own 'B.S.' create barriers to authentic connections, delaying our self-actualization and relational growth? How does detachment from our own 'B.S.' contribute to overcoming relational barriers and fostering authentic connections? What limitations hinder our understanding of 'is-ness' or 'being' when we solely embrace our own 'B.S.' as absolute truth? What are the 4 types of illusion? Are 'right', 'wrong', 'good', 'bad', and such concepts just illusions for human beings? Do they actually exist or is everything subjective? What is some propaganda surrounding healing and wound eradication? How does the idea that WIPs “come healed” limit their experience of “isness” or being within a healthy dynamic? What personality type thinks they are always right? Why is it not possible to achieve acceptance of the “now” from a space of “doing” and/or external validation seeking? How does seeking safety connect to the adversarial nature we develop in the process of becoming “certain” about our partners and relationships? Can the picking apart of our partners be (although not always intentional) merely a means to an end to achieve “safety”? In what ways do we incriminate ourselves by seeking the “certainty” we claim to need from our partners in order to be “safe”? Can attachment to your B.S. become a relational odor that repels authentic connections and thus delays self actualization? If so, how can detachment from your B.S. remedy this issue? What limitations arise in our understanding of “is-ness” or “being” when we accept only our B.S. as absolute truth? 1. How does Robert Anton Wilson's concept of "Maybe Logic" challenge traditional notions of absolute truth? 2. To what extent does the brain's selective abstraction of reality limit our perception of truth? 3. Can the idea of "is-ness" be reconciled with the ever-changing nature of reality as proposed by quantum physics? 4. How do different reality tunnels influence our interpretations of metaphysical concepts? 5. What are the psychological effects of living with the awareness that our perceptions might be illusions? 6. How does the acceptance of "Maybe Logic" affect our approach to philosophical and scientific inquiries? 7. Can acknowledging the illusion of certainty improve mental health outcomes in psychotherapy? 8. How do cultural and societal influences shape the reality tunnels we develop? 9. In what ways can the concept of "is-ness" be applied to enhance spiritual practices and experiences? 10. Does Maybe Logic imply that all forms of knowledge are inherently uncertain and subjective? 11. How can understanding our own cognitive biases help in deconstructing rigid belief systems? 12. What role does Maybe Logic play in addressing dogmatism within religious and spiritual contexts? 13. How might embracing uncertainty impact our relationships and communication with others? 14. Can the illusion of certainty be seen as a defense mechanism against existential anxiety? 15. How does Maybe Logic challenge the traditional binary of right and wrong in moral philosophy? 16. In what ways can Maybe Logic contribute to a more flexible and open-minded approach to learning? 17. How does the concept of Maybe Logic intersect with theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles? 18. What are the implications of Maybe Logic for the field of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)? 19. How can Maybe Logic inform our understanding of neuroplasticity and brain adaptability? 20. To what extent does Maybe Logic align with or contradict postmodernist views on truth and reality? 21. How can the practice of Maybe Logic enhance critical thinking skills in education? 22. What are the potential drawbacks of adopting a Maybe Logic mindset in decision-making processes? 23. How does Maybe Logic relate to the concept of mindfulness and present-moment awareness? 24. In what ways can Maybe Logic inform our understanding of identity and self-concept? 25. How does Maybe Logic impact our approach to conflict resolution and negotiation? 26. Can Maybe Logic help in developing more inclusive and diverse perspectives in social sciences? 27. How does Maybe Logic challenge the traditional narratives of history and historiography? 28. What are the ethical implications of applying Maybe Logic to moral and legal judgments? 29. How does the acceptance of Maybe Logic influence our perception of time and space in cosmology? 30. Can Maybe Logic be integrated into existential therapy to address the uncertainty of meaning and purpose? 31. How does Maybe Logic affect our understanding of consciousness and subjective experience? 32. What are the implications of Maybe Logic for artificial intelligence and machine learning? 33. How does Maybe Logic challenge conventional approaches to scientific research and methodology? 34. In what ways can Maybe Logic contribute to a more holistic understanding of human behavior and psychology? 35. How does Maybe Logic inform our understanding of paradoxes and contradictions in philosophy? 36. Can Maybe Logic provide a framework for reconciling conflicts between science and spirituality? 37. How does Maybe Logic impact our approach to ethics and moral reasoning in complex situations? 38. What are the potential benefits of incorporating Maybe Logic into organizational and leadership practices? 39. How does Maybe Logic influence our understanding of language and meaning in semiotics? 40. In what ways can Maybe Logic inform our approach to ecological and environmental issues? 41. How does Maybe Logic challenge the notion of fixed identities in gender and sexuality studies? 42. Can Maybe Logic help in developing more adaptive and resilient coping strategies for stress and trauma? 43. How does Maybe Logic relate to the concept of cognitive dissonance in psychology? 44. What are the implications of Maybe Logic for our understanding of creativity and innovation? 45. How does Maybe Logic inform our approach to education and pedag