Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg
Water under the bridge, and judges kissing babies, in this episode of Secondary Rules. What business do Courts have thinking about socio-economic rights? Can a Constitution transform a society, and can litigation safeguard a democracy? All this and more as we consider the right to water in the Constitutional Court of South Africa.
- Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg [2009] ZACC 28
- Constitution of the Republic of South Africa(1996)
- Couzens, ‘Avoiding Mazibuko’(2016)
- Dugard and Mohlakoana ‘More work for women : a rights-based analysis of women's access to basic services in South Africa’(2009)
Learn more about the ANU College of Law here. Our thanks to the ANU College of Law Marketing and Communications team. ANU acknowledges and celebrates the First Australians on whose traditional lands we meet, and pays our respect to elders past and present.
View all episodes
By Ryan Goss, Joshua NeohWater under the bridge, and judges kissing babies, in this episode of Secondary Rules. What business do Courts have thinking about socio-economic rights? Can a Constitution transform a society, and can litigation safeguard a democracy? All this and more as we consider the right to water in the Constitutional Court of South Africa.
- Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg [2009] ZACC 28
- Constitution of the Republic of South Africa(1996)
- Couzens, ‘Avoiding Mazibuko’(2016)
- Dugard and Mohlakoana ‘More work for women : a rights-based analysis of women's access to basic services in South Africa’(2009)
Learn more about the ANU College of Law here. Our thanks to the ANU College of Law Marketing and Communications team. ANU acknowledges and celebrates the First Australians on whose traditional lands we meet, and pays our respect to elders past and present.