
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


McLaughlin Chiropractic Assoc. v. McKesson Corp.
Docket Number: 23-1226
Date Argued:01/21/25
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-1226_apl1.pdf
DECISION BELOW: 2023 WL 7015279
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 22-15710, 22-15732
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
By Oral ArgumentsMcLaughlin Chiropractic Assoc. v. McKesson Corp.
Docket Number: 23-1226
Date Argued:01/21/25
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2024/23-1226_apl1.pdf
DECISION BELOW: 2023 WL 7015279
LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 22-15710, 22-15732
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether the Hobbs Act required the district court in this case to accept the FCC's legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.