
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
A Notebook LM overview of the opinion in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al., decided by the United States Supreme Court in June of 2025. This case examines whether individuals receiving Medicaidbenefits can sue state officials under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for alleged violations of the "any-qualified-provider" provision(§1396a(a)(23)(A)) of the Medicaid Act. The Court ultimately reverses the Fourth Circuit's decision, holding that this specific spending-power statute does not clearly and unambiguously confer individual rights enforceable through §1983, emphasizing that such rights are only recognized in atypical cases where Congress explicitly uses rights-creating language.
A Notebook LM overview of the opinion in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic et al., decided by the United States Supreme Court in June of 2025. This case examines whether individuals receiving Medicaidbenefits can sue state officials under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for alleged violations of the "any-qualified-provider" provision(§1396a(a)(23)(A)) of the Medicaid Act. The Court ultimately reverses the Fourth Circuit's decision, holding that this specific spending-power statute does not clearly and unambiguously confer individual rights enforceable through §1983, emphasizing that such rights are only recognized in atypical cases where Congress explicitly uses rights-creating language.