Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Methodist Church Civil Dissolution a Model For National Dissolution
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Methodist Church Civil Dissolution a Model For National Dissolution
Episode 25 August 23, 2019
Topic: Irreconcilable Differences
Title: Methodist Church Civil Dissolution a Model For National Dissolution
Our podcast today uses the example of the Methodist Church schism as a model for solving the ideological differences in America between Democrat socialists and natural rights conservatives.
“We’ve discovered the United Methodist Church can’t live in the same house together peaceably, but we can live next door to one another,” said the Rev. Kent Millard, president of United Theological Seminary, who helped organize the strategy for civil dissolution.
The strategy for dissolution for the Methodists is called the “Indianapolis Plan.” It is sparked by what church leaders called “irreconcilable differences,” the same language used in no-fault divorce civil law.
The Methodists are split over the interpretation of their constitution regarding the role of gays and lesbians in performing church functions, like marriages.
The Methodist constitution is contained in a document titled, the Book of Discipline, which describes “the practice of homosexuality” as incompatible with “church teaching.”
The analogy between the Methodist divorce and the national divorce between socialism and competitive free market individualism follows the same ideological differences in the sense that the differences are “irreconcilable.”
The social and cultural values of the Democrat socialists do not connect at any point with the cultural and social values of natural rights conservatives.
On every single principle of a natural rights republic, the socialists have an alien, subversive, view of America. The bedrock starting point for the differences is that socialists deeply believe that America is a flawed, and racist nation, founded on the sin of slavery.
In the absence of commonly-shared cultural values, the socialists disavow voluntary allegiance to obey the rule of law.
Conservatives must find the moral courage to deal with socialists in a strategy of civil dissolution much like the Methodist conservatives are dealing with the ideological divisions in their church.
Our podcast concludes that conservatives must come up with a plan, like the Indianapolis plan, to lay out the strategy for dissolving the nation, and splitting up the assets, in a no-fault divorce.
I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this is the copyrighted Citizen Liberty Party News Network podcast for August 23, 2019.
Our podcast today is under the CLP topic category Irreconcilable Differences and is titled, Methodist Church Civil Dissolution a Model For National Dissolution
The most recent podcast of the CLP News Network is available for free. The entire text and audio archive of our podcasts are available for subscription of $30 per year, at the CLP News Network.com.
View all episodes
By CLP News Network with Laurie Thomas VassEpisode 25 August 23, 2019
Topic: Irreconcilable Differences
Title: Methodist Church Civil Dissolution a Model For National Dissolution
Our podcast today uses the example of the Methodist Church schism as a model for solving the ideological differences in America between Democrat socialists and natural rights conservatives.
“We’ve discovered the United Methodist Church can’t live in the same house together peaceably, but we can live next door to one another,” said the Rev. Kent Millard, president of United Theological Seminary, who helped organize the strategy for civil dissolution.
The strategy for dissolution for the Methodists is called the “Indianapolis Plan.” It is sparked by what church leaders called “irreconcilable differences,” the same language used in no-fault divorce civil law.
The Methodists are split over the interpretation of their constitution regarding the role of gays and lesbians in performing church functions, like marriages.
The Methodist constitution is contained in a document titled, the Book of Discipline, which describes “the practice of homosexuality” as incompatible with “church teaching.”
The analogy between the Methodist divorce and the national divorce between socialism and competitive free market individualism follows the same ideological differences in the sense that the differences are “irreconcilable.”
The social and cultural values of the Democrat socialists do not connect at any point with the cultural and social values of natural rights conservatives.
On every single principle of a natural rights republic, the socialists have an alien, subversive, view of America. The bedrock starting point for the differences is that socialists deeply believe that America is a flawed, and racist nation, founded on the sin of slavery.
In the absence of commonly-shared cultural values, the socialists disavow voluntary allegiance to obey the rule of law.
Conservatives must find the moral courage to deal with socialists in a strategy of civil dissolution much like the Methodist conservatives are dealing with the ideological divisions in their church.
Our podcast concludes that conservatives must come up with a plan, like the Indianapolis plan, to lay out the strategy for dissolving the nation, and splitting up the assets, in a no-fault divorce.
I am Laurie Thomas Vass, and this is the copyrighted Citizen Liberty Party News Network podcast for August 23, 2019.
Our podcast today is under the CLP topic category Irreconcilable Differences and is titled, Methodist Church Civil Dissolution a Model For National Dissolution
The most recent podcast of the CLP News Network is available for free. The entire text and audio archive of our podcasts are available for subscription of $30 per year, at the CLP News Network.com.