Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Mile 3: The Greatest Sucky Thing
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Mile 3: The Greatest Sucky Thing
Mile 3: The Greatest Sucky Thing
What if pain isn’t the enemy but the teacher? What if “sucky things” aren’t obstacles but doorways?
In this episode, we dive deep into the strange logic of running: where suffering births joy, stiffness hides in cushioning, and smooth flow demands awkwardness first. From biomechanics to philosophy, we unpack seven paradoxes that will change how you think about effort, rest, and resilience. Expect cutting-edge research, stories of runners who found breakthroughs in the suck, and Camus’s rebellious Sisyphus pushing his boulder smiling. Smart, witty, and unflinchingly honest, this is running as you’ve never heard it.
New Points & Evidence (Not in the Book)
Cushioning Paradox (2025 Update):
New data from Malisoux & Theisen (2025) show runners in maximal-cushion shoes can actually land harder and experience stiffer biomechanics. Yet, this doesn’t reduce injury rates .
Economy vs Gait Transitions:
Stearne et al. (2023) highlight that changing footstrike patterns may temporarily worsen mechanical loading and injury risk during adaptation .
Master Runner Paradox Validated:
Robinson et al. (2024) confirm older runners maintain oxygen economy even with age-related biomechanical shifts, and yet their tissue resilience declines, raising injury risk.
Propulsion Paradox (Elastic > Muscle):
Kram & Arellano’s (2025) biomechanics work indicates that ~80% of metabolic cost supports body weight or propulsion via passive elastic recoil, and not active calf push-off.
Multivariate Risk Paradox Nuance:
A 2024 MDPI study confirms that multifactorial models (e.g., inflammatory markers, body composition, demographics, stress) predict ~67% of injury risk, while single metrics like gait mechanics predict far less. This clarifies the illusion-of-control paradox: biomechanical tweaking doesn’t grant safety in a complex system.
Flow–Unsmooth Paradox Reinforced:
Reviews in motor learning affirm flow emerges only after the “awkward” stage, confirming that early-stage discomfort is essential to achieve “smooth” performance.
Rest Paradox (Quality vs Quantity):
Both overtraining research and athletic recovery science agree: too much rest stalls adaptation, too little invites breakdown. Real growth lies in balancing load with purposeful rest.
Camusian Rebellion Theme:
Sisyphus’s “lucid confrontation” (from The Myth of Sisyphus) resonates with runners who choose to press on in spite of knowing there’s no end to the struggle, yet find meaning in the rebellion anyway.
View all episodes
By Mok Ying RongMile 3: The Greatest Sucky Thing
What if pain isn’t the enemy but the teacher? What if “sucky things” aren’t obstacles but doorways?
In this episode, we dive deep into the strange logic of running: where suffering births joy, stiffness hides in cushioning, and smooth flow demands awkwardness first. From biomechanics to philosophy, we unpack seven paradoxes that will change how you think about effort, rest, and resilience. Expect cutting-edge research, stories of runners who found breakthroughs in the suck, and Camus’s rebellious Sisyphus pushing his boulder smiling. Smart, witty, and unflinchingly honest, this is running as you’ve never heard it.
New Points & Evidence (Not in the Book)
Cushioning Paradox (2025 Update):
New data from Malisoux & Theisen (2025) show runners in maximal-cushion shoes can actually land harder and experience stiffer biomechanics. Yet, this doesn’t reduce injury rates .
Economy vs Gait Transitions:
Stearne et al. (2023) highlight that changing footstrike patterns may temporarily worsen mechanical loading and injury risk during adaptation .
Master Runner Paradox Validated:
Robinson et al. (2024) confirm older runners maintain oxygen economy even with age-related biomechanical shifts, and yet their tissue resilience declines, raising injury risk.
Propulsion Paradox (Elastic > Muscle):
Kram & Arellano’s (2025) biomechanics work indicates that ~80% of metabolic cost supports body weight or propulsion via passive elastic recoil, and not active calf push-off.
Multivariate Risk Paradox Nuance:
A 2024 MDPI study confirms that multifactorial models (e.g., inflammatory markers, body composition, demographics, stress) predict ~67% of injury risk, while single metrics like gait mechanics predict far less. This clarifies the illusion-of-control paradox: biomechanical tweaking doesn’t grant safety in a complex system.
Flow–Unsmooth Paradox Reinforced:
Reviews in motor learning affirm flow emerges only after the “awkward” stage, confirming that early-stage discomfort is essential to achieve “smooth” performance.
Rest Paradox (Quality vs Quantity):
Both overtraining research and athletic recovery science agree: too much rest stalls adaptation, too little invites breakdown. Real growth lies in balancing load with purposeful rest.
Camusian Rebellion Theme:
Sisyphus’s “lucid confrontation” (from The Myth of Sisyphus) resonates with runners who choose to press on in spite of knowing there’s no end to the struggle, yet find meaning in the rebellion anyway.