John Searle's "Minds, Brains, and Programs" paper argues against strong AI, the idea that appropriately programmed computers can genuinely think. He uses the Chinese Room Argument, a thought experiment where a person manipulates Chinese symbols without understanding them, to demonstrate that syntax (symbol manipulation) is not sufficient for semantics (meaning and understanding). Searle contends that intentionality, the aboutness of mental states, requires specific causal powers inherent in biological brains, which computer programs lack. The included commentaries offer various critiques and defenses of Searle's argument, exploring the nature of intentionality, consciousness, and the relationship between mind and brain.

Please note that the podcast covers key points from the source with synthetic voices, which may have glitches. It’s a reflective, not comprehensive, interpretation.

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit syntheticsynthesis.substack.com