My own theory on improv.

The three Warm-Ups we did this time were:

1. Horcrux
2. Quidditch
3. Monster Book of Monsters

I solemnly swear I’m up to no good. Touched on the concept of “ironic detachment” during the warm-ups. Opened up on my own personal theory of improv a bit, and my start in improv. I believe that one way to attack an improv scene or set is by recognizing the patterns or behavior.  The first pattern or behavior could be as complex as “a team of scientists defusing the bomb made of anti-matter during Christmas” or as simple as this one person repeats a beeping noise.  Once that pattern has been established as the status quo, then a second pattern is introduced either as an alternate to the first or in contrast.  Some companies may identify this as game.  I think it’s more about patterns – which is inclusive of character, environment or relationship. The first pattern should have a wealth of information or be explored for a while before any other patterns are introduced. It also relates to a sense of timing as to when patterns should shift.