
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Rebecca Tushnet discusses the potential explores the implications of misleading advertisements, particularly concerning pregnancy clinics. Even true statements can be disparaging if they mislead consumers. Cases like the California lawsuit questioning the use of "Dr." titles. Tushnet examines when products like milk can be labeled as such and scrutinizes claims like "clinically proven" by SlimFast. She also addresses dark patterns, deceptive tactics affecting user behaviour, and the FTC's enforcement of these laws. Additionally, she contrasts the U.S. approach to advertising and good faith with European standards, highlighting challenges like drug subscription cancellations.
Support the show
4.3
66 ratings
Rebecca Tushnet discusses the potential explores the implications of misleading advertisements, particularly concerning pregnancy clinics. Even true statements can be disparaging if they mislead consumers. Cases like the California lawsuit questioning the use of "Dr." titles. Tushnet examines when products like milk can be labeled as such and scrutinizes claims like "clinically proven" by SlimFast. She also addresses dark patterns, deceptive tactics affecting user behaviour, and the FTC's enforcement of these laws. Additionally, she contrasts the U.S. approach to advertising and good faith with European standards, highlighting challenges like drug subscription cancellations.
Support the show
56,155 Listeners