Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Mississippi, ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Mississippi, ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
A case in which the Court ruled that, in order for a case to be removed to a federal district court instead of a state court under the Class Action Fairness Act, at least 100 people must be represented by the lawsuit.
View all episodes
By Oyez
4.6
88 ratings
A case in which the Court ruled that, in order for a case to be removed to a federal district court instead of a state court under the Class Action Fairness Act, at least 100 people must be represented by the lawsuit.
More shows like U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments
View all
U.S. Supreme Court 2012 Term Arguments
11 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court 2011 Term Arguments
10 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments
4 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Announcements
47 Listeners
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
648 Listeners
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
22 Listeners