Iran defiant, Israel strikes civilians, IAEA biased, war looms, Arab role unclear.

Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:

1. What is the main message of the Iranian Supreme Leader's response to Trump’s threats?
2. What are the main goals and targets of Israel's attacks in Tehran?
3. What is happening with the IAEA, and why does it seem inconsistent in its statements about Iran’s nuclear program?
4. How effective have Israel’s missile defense systems been against Iranian attacks, and will Iran escalate its strikes?
5. Is there an evaluation within Iran that Arab states might join Israel in attacking Iran?

Mohammad Marandi:

1. The Supreme Leader emphasized that Iran will not be intimidated or surrender, warning that any U.S. strike would result in greater harm to America than Iran.
2. Israel has targeted civilian areas including hospitals, ambulances, and buildings like the Red Crescent, showing no regard for human life and continuing its aggressive policies with Western backing.
3. The IAEA is politically driven, dominated by Western members who align with U.S. interests, making its reports biased and unreliable.
4. Iran is strategically exhausting Israeli and American missile defenses while preparing for a potential counterattack that could destabilize the global economy.
5. While Arab states haven't directly joined Israel, they host U.S. bases and support Western policies; however, Iran assumes Trump will attack regardless, and is prepared for war.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.