Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Months Into a Case and Still No Evidence | Episode 470
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Months Into a Case and Still No Evidence | Episode 470
Months Into a Case and Still No Evidence | Episode 470
A lawsuit can say almost anything on paper. The hard part is proving it when someone is under oath and the details have to add up.
We talk about the First Amendment, freedom of speech, and why I’m willing to speak publicly when the subject is my own livelihood and the people around me. I also share a blunt reality many listeners face in silence: if you’re paying for legal help and your attorney isn’t listening or acting on what you bring them, you’re allowed to make a change. The attorney-client relationship is a professional partnership, not a life sentence, and protecting your interests is part of navigating the judicial system.
Then we get specific. Using our understanding of the Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System public access policy, I walk through a deposition summary tied to a defamation complaint in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. The claim says our content drove people away from an organization and caused $350,000 in losses. But months into the case, after roughly 293 days, the testimony we discuss raises a core problem in civil litigation: the lack of direct numbers, direct attribution, and clear causation tying specific departures to specific videos, podcasts, or posts.
If you care about legal accountability, public records, and what “evidence” should mean before someone puts a dollar figure on another family’s name, this conversation is for you. Subscribe to the show, share it with someone who needs it, and leave a review with your take: what should courts expect when accusations are big but the numbers are missing?
*Donate Today: lovevoices.org
**Find our book here:
Amazon: https://voices-for-voices.org/3ZhJ6AW
Publisher: https://voices-for-voices.org/3LKL1uN
***Website: https://voices-for-voices.org/4byLXgb
Instagram: @voicesforvoices
TikTok: @voices_for_voices
Facebook: Voices for Voices
*Voices for Voices is a 501c3 nonprofit charity. All donations are 100% tax deductible.
Chapter Markers
- 0:00 - Welcome And Big Sharing Goal
- 2:20 - First Amendment And Turning The Channel
- 5:50 - When You Need To Fire A Lawyer
- 8:05 - Public Records And Case Background
- 11:30 - Why Former Counsel Was Let Go
- 17:20 - Deposition Answers On Alleged Losses
- 25:15 - Accountability And The Pizza Shop Analogy
- 31:12 - Closing Thoughts And Share Request
#justiceforjustin #justiceforvoicesforvoicestiktok #VoicesforVoices #MathInLitigation #EvidenceBasedLaw #MathematicalEvidence #DataDrivenJustice #LegalStrategy #JusticeThroughNumbers #AnalyzingClaims #JustinAlanHayes #JustinHayes #help3billion #TikTok #Instagram #truth #Jesusaire #VoiceForChange #HealingTogether #Episode470
Support the show
View all episodes
By Founder of Voices for Voices®, Justin Alan HayesMonths Into a Case and Still No Evidence | Episode 470
A lawsuit can say almost anything on paper. The hard part is proving it when someone is under oath and the details have to add up.
We talk about the First Amendment, freedom of speech, and why I’m willing to speak publicly when the subject is my own livelihood and the people around me. I also share a blunt reality many listeners face in silence: if you’re paying for legal help and your attorney isn’t listening or acting on what you bring them, you’re allowed to make a change. The attorney-client relationship is a professional partnership, not a life sentence, and protecting your interests is part of navigating the judicial system.
Then we get specific. Using our understanding of the Pennsylvania Unified Judicial System public access policy, I walk through a deposition summary tied to a defamation complaint in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. The claim says our content drove people away from an organization and caused $350,000 in losses. But months into the case, after roughly 293 days, the testimony we discuss raises a core problem in civil litigation: the lack of direct numbers, direct attribution, and clear causation tying specific departures to specific videos, podcasts, or posts.
If you care about legal accountability, public records, and what “evidence” should mean before someone puts a dollar figure on another family’s name, this conversation is for you. Subscribe to the show, share it with someone who needs it, and leave a review with your take: what should courts expect when accusations are big but the numbers are missing?
*Donate Today: lovevoices.org
**Find our book here:
Amazon: https://voices-for-voices.org/3ZhJ6AW
Publisher: https://voices-for-voices.org/3LKL1uN
***Website: https://voices-for-voices.org/4byLXgb
Instagram: @voicesforvoices
TikTok: @voices_for_voices
Facebook: Voices for Voices
*Voices for Voices is a 501c3 nonprofit charity. All donations are 100% tax deductible.
Chapter Markers
- 0:00 - Welcome And Big Sharing Goal
- 2:20 - First Amendment And Turning The Channel
- 5:50 - When You Need To Fire A Lawyer
- 8:05 - Public Records And Case Background
- 11:30 - Why Former Counsel Was Let Go
- 17:20 - Deposition Answers On Alleged Losses
- 25:15 - Accountability And The Pizza Shop Analogy
- 31:12 - Closing Thoughts And Share Request
#justiceforjustin #justiceforvoicesforvoicestiktok #VoicesforVoices #MathInLitigation #EvidenceBasedLaw #MathematicalEvidence #DataDrivenJustice #LegalStrategy #JusticeThroughNumbers #AnalyzingClaims #JustinAlanHayes #JustinHayes #help3billion #TikTok #Instagram #truth #Jesusaire #VoiceForChange #HealingTogether #Episode470
Support the show