
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of HackrlIfe I take as a critical look at Samsung's research on building "multimodal AI agents" using no-code platforms like Flowise.
While the paper sounds impressive with terms like "multimodal LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems," I dug into what these tools actually do versus the marketing hype.
What I Found It Really Is: API orchestration tools that connect existing AI services (OpenAI, Stable Diffusion, Luma AI) through visual drag-and-drop interfaces.
You're not building AI – you're chaining together existing APIs with better UX.
Where I Think It Actually Works:
The Real Value I See: Speed of implementation and iteration for non-technical teams. Instead of waiting weeks for developer resources, growth teams can prototype automation workflows in days.
I believe tools like Flowise are useful for operational efficiency, not AI innovation. They're worth exploring if you have routine, rule-based content tasks that currently eat up team time. But I recommend approaching them as workflow automation tools, not magical AI solutions.
My advice: Start small, test one simple use case, measure time savings, then expand gradually if it proves valuable.
My main insight: The competitive advantage isn't in the AI capabilities – it's in reducing friction between having an automation idea and implementing it.
In this episode, I give growth professionals a realistic assessment of what these tools can actually do for their teams.
By DevIn this episode of HackrlIfe I take as a critical look at Samsung's research on building "multimodal AI agents" using no-code platforms like Flowise.
While the paper sounds impressive with terms like "multimodal LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems," I dug into what these tools actually do versus the marketing hype.
What I Found It Really Is: API orchestration tools that connect existing AI services (OpenAI, Stable Diffusion, Luma AI) through visual drag-and-drop interfaces.
You're not building AI – you're chaining together existing APIs with better UX.
Where I Think It Actually Works:
The Real Value I See: Speed of implementation and iteration for non-technical teams. Instead of waiting weeks for developer resources, growth teams can prototype automation workflows in days.
I believe tools like Flowise are useful for operational efficiency, not AI innovation. They're worth exploring if you have routine, rule-based content tasks that currently eat up team time. But I recommend approaching them as workflow automation tools, not magical AI solutions.
My advice: Start small, test one simple use case, measure time savings, then expand gradually if it proves valuable.
My main insight: The competitive advantage isn't in the AI capabilities – it's in reducing friction between having an automation idea and implementing it.
In this episode, I give growth professionals a realistic assessment of what these tools can actually do for their teams.