Anthropic's Mythos AI model lives up to its reputation for detecting software vulnerabilities, significantly outperforming other models when analyzing live code alongside source code, according to independent testing by cybersecurity firm XBOW. However, the testing revealed important limitations: Mythos is less effective analyzing source code alone, can be overly literal in its judgments, and costs roughly five times more than Anthropic's Opus model, making it less cost-efficient than some alternatives like GPT-5.5 for certain tasks. While Mythos excels at source code audits and reverse engineering, its high cost and mixed judgment capabilities mean it's a powerful but expensive tool that may not be the best choice for every security scenario.