In this episode of the weekly Criminal Law update, we delve into the Court of Appeal's recent decisions on crucial evidential and sentencing issues. The case of Kurtaj against R highlights the challenges of admitting bad character evidence in circumstances where the defendant is found unfit to plead, showcasing the balance between probative value and the risk of prejudice. Moving to sentencing, Kyle Woods against R raises questions about the appropriateness of lengthy sentences for young offenders, emphasising the need for a nuanced application of the Children Guideline. The YAW against R and ACP against R cases examine the admissibility of prior false allegations in sexual offence trials, underscoring the stringent evidential standards required to ensure fairness. Finally, Evans against R explores the definition of public office in the context of prison officials and the associated responsibilities that can lead to criminal liability. Collectively, these cases articulate the Court of Appeal's commitment to fair procedural safeguards while navigating complex issues of criminal accountability.

Kurtaj against R [2025] EWCA Crim 1163

Kyle Woods against R [2025] EWCA Crim 1154

YAW against R [2025] EWCA Crim 1143

ACP against R [2025] EWCA Crim 1140

Evans against R [2025] EWCA Crim 1150