
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Phillip Jauregui discusses the potential future vacancies in the Supreme Court, emphasizing the importance of being prepared for such events. He reflects on past vacancies and the implications of judicial nominations, particularly focusing on Judge Kyle Duncan as a strong candidate. The conversation delves into the criteria for evaluating judicial prospects, including their long-term commitment to constitutional principles, judicial philosophy, and specific cases that highlight their positions on key issues such as religious liberty, life, and family matters. Jauregui stresses the need for courage in judicial decisions and encourages listeners to engage in the process of researching and advocating for judicial nominations.
By Phillip JaureguiIn this episode, Phillip Jauregui discusses the potential future vacancies in the Supreme Court, emphasizing the importance of being prepared for such events. He reflects on past vacancies and the implications of judicial nominations, particularly focusing on Judge Kyle Duncan as a strong candidate. The conversation delves into the criteria for evaluating judicial prospects, including their long-term commitment to constitutional principles, judicial philosophy, and specific cases that highlight their positions on key issues such as religious liberty, life, and family matters. Jauregui stresses the need for courage in judicial decisions and encourages listeners to engage in the process of researching and advocating for judicial nominations.