Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share NCLA Case Exposes How State Governments Escape Consequences for Unconstitutional Covid Policies
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
NCLA Case Exposes How State Governments Escape Consequences for Unconstitutional Covid Policies
In Høeg v. Newsom, NCLA represents several California physicians whose First Amendment rights were violated by Assembly Bill (AB) 2098—a law that subjected physicians to discipline for giving patients advice about Covid-related matters that didn’t comport with the “scientific consensus.” Many bad government actors have avoided facing legal consequences for unconstitutional actions by abusing the mootness doctrine.
In this episode, NCLA’s Jenin Younes discusses the recent oral argument in Høeg v. Newsom and the exploitation of the mootness doctrine.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
View all episodes
By Administrative Static
5
1313 ratings
In Høeg v. Newsom, NCLA represents several California physicians whose First Amendment rights were violated by Assembly Bill (AB) 2098—a law that subjected physicians to discipline for giving patients advice about Covid-related matters that didn’t comport with the “scientific consensus.” Many bad government actors have avoided facing legal consequences for unconstitutional actions by abusing the mootness doctrine.
In this episode, NCLA’s Jenin Younes discusses the recent oral argument in Høeg v. Newsom and the exploitation of the mootness doctrine.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.