On February 15, 2021, Erin M. Hawley and Jennifer Nou joined the Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter for a discussion on the future of administrative law. Featuring: - Erin M. Hawley, Senior Legal Fellow, Independent Women's Law Center - Jennifer Nou, Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School - [Introduction] Hallie Saunders, Programming Director, The Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter

On February 15, 2021, Erin M. Hawley and Jennifer Nou joined the Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter for a discussion on the future of administrative law.Featuring:- Erin M. Hawley, Senior Legal Fellow, Independent Women's Law Center- Jennifer Nou, Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School- [Introduction] Hallie Saunders, Programming Director, The Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter

On February 15, 2021, Erin M. Hawley and Jennifer Nou joined the Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter for a discussion on the future of administrative law. Featuring: - Erin M. Hawley, Senior Legal Fellow, Independent Women's Law Center - Jennifer Nou, Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School - [Introduction] Hallie Saunders, Programming Director, The Federalist Society's Chicago Student Chapter

Necessary & Proper Episode 63: Kisor and Gundy – The Future of Administrative Law?

Necessary & Proper is the official podcast of the Federalist Society's Article I Initiative. The Framers of the Constitution intended the legislature to be the most powerful branch of government. In its present state, as the government operates on a day to day basis, it is not. Were the Founders simply wrong about the inherent powers of the legislative branch? Has the institution of Congress developed practices that are not compatible with the text of the Constitution? Why are current Congressional leaders unable or unwilling to act as an effective check on the presidency? Why is Congress unable to pass a budget? Why has Congress ceded much of its authority to the executive branch and to administrative agencies? What does it mean to serve productively as a member of the House or Senate? These and other important questions are the focus of the Article I Initiative. Periodic releases from Necessary & Proper will feature experts who can shed light on what the Framers envisioned for the legislative branch and how it can be restored to its proper place in the constitutional order.

News

Politics

Necessary &amp; Proper is the official podcast of the Federalist Society's Article I Initiative. The Framers of the Constitution intended the legislature to be the most powerful branch of government. In its present state, as the government operates on a day to day basis, it is not. Were the Founders simply wrong about the inherent powers of the legislative branch? Has the institution of Congress developed practices that are not compatible with the text of the Constitution? Why are current Congressional leaders unable or unwilling to act as an effective check on the presidency? Why is Congress unable to pass a budget? Why has Congress ceded much of its authority to the executive branch and to administrative agencies? What does it mean to serve productively as a member of the House or Senate? These and other important questions are the focus of the Article I Initiative. Periodic releases from Necessary &amp; Proper will feature experts who can shed light on what the Framers envisioned for the legislative branch and how it can be restored to its proper place in the constitutional order.

Share Necessary & Proper Episode 63: Kisor and Gundy – The Future of Administrative Law?

Sign up to save your podcasts

Necessary & Proper Episode 63: Kisor and Gundy – The Future of Administrative Law?

Necessary & Proper Episode 63: Kisor and Gundy – The Future of Administrative Law?

More shows like Necessary & Proper Podcast

FedSoc Events

SCOTUScast

FedSoc Forums

Faculty Division Bookshelf

Federalist Radio Hour

The Editors

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Uncommon Knowledge

Advisory Opinions

Talks from the Hoover Institution

Morning Wire

WSJ Opinion: Free Expression