Nice articles on climate change, however I have ethical issues about using the device of interview to cover a broad range of ideas with out thorough connect of all the ideas. The Hubble is in trouble, I found the mind communication science pretty low quality shameless commercial plug, and as such the speculative waffle pretty hard to swallow. The view that people like positive people and follow negative people seems limited to me as it lumps all people readers into one amorphous category. I also find that this research doesn't really get to grip with what we know about game theory. MP4 recording     MP3 recording -- -- Your browser does not support the audio element.