Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Nick Reed PODCAST 10.12.22 - FBI Intel Says Durham Agency Offered Steele $1M to Corroborate Dossier
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Nick Reed PODCAST 10.12.22 - FBI Intel Says Durham Agency Offered Steele $1M to Corroborate Dossier
Hour 1 -
Happy Wednesday! Here's what Nick Reed covers this hour:
An FBI analyst told Special Counsel John Durham on Tuesday in federal court that the agency offered former British spy Christopher Steele "up to $1 million" to corroborate evidence in his now-discredited dossier that was central to a federal investigation into possible collusion between Russia and the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.
Following the bombshell revelation from the trial of Igor Danchenko that the FBI offered Christopher Steele $1 million to corroborate his dossier, former House Intelligence Committee investigator Kash Patel said this proves the bureau knew it hadn't been able to verify the Trump-Russia collusion narrative and misled Congress.
The United States Supreme Court has invalidated a lower appeals court decision regarding mail-in ballots that changed the course of a judiciary race in Pennsylvania.
View all episodes
By KSGF
4.8
2020 ratings
Hour 1 -
Happy Wednesday! Here's what Nick Reed covers this hour:
An FBI analyst told Special Counsel John Durham on Tuesday in federal court that the agency offered former British spy Christopher Steele "up to $1 million" to corroborate evidence in his now-discredited dossier that was central to a federal investigation into possible collusion between Russia and the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.
Following the bombshell revelation from the trial of Igor Danchenko that the FBI offered Christopher Steele $1 million to corroborate his dossier, former House Intelligence Committee investigator Kash Patel said this proves the bureau knew it hadn't been able to verify the Trump-Russia collusion narrative and misled Congress.
The United States Supreme Court has invalidated a lower appeals court decision regarding mail-in ballots that changed the course of a judiciary race in Pennsylvania.