
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_Pandemic
Despite advances in modern information technology, the accuracy of data collection has not advanced in the United Kingdom for over 150 years,
because the same problems of erroneous data entry found then are still found now in the COVID pandemic,
not only in the UK but all over the world.
We have independently discovered the same UK data problem and solution for assessing COVID-19 vaccination as Alfred Russel Wallace had 150 years ago in investigating the consequences of Vaccination Acts starting in 1840 on smallpox:
The Alfred Russel Wallace as used by Wilson Sy
“Having thus cleared away the mass of doubtful or erroneous statistics,
depending on comparisons of the vaccinated and unvaccinated in limited areas or selected groups of patients,
we turn to the only really important evidence, those ‘masses of national experience’...”
https://archive.org/details/b21356336/page/n3/mode/2up
Alfred Russel Wallace, 1880s–1890s
1840 Vaccination Act
Provided free smallpox vaccination to the poor
Banned variolation
Vaccination compulsory in 1853, 1867
Why his interest?
C 1885
The Leicester Anti-Vaccination demonstrations (1885)
Growing public resistance to compulsory vaccination
Wallace’s increasing involvement in social reform and statistical arguments
Statistical critique of vaccination
Government data on:
Smallpox mortality trends before and after compulsory vaccination
Case mortality rates
Vaccination vs. sanitation effects
Mortality trends before and after each Act, 1853 and 1867
“Forty-Five Years of Registration Statistics, Proving Vaccination to Be Both Useless and Dangerous” (1885)
“Vaccination a Delusion; Its Penal Enforcement a Crime” (1898)
Contributions to the Royal Commission on Vaccination (1890–1896)
Wallace argued:
Declining smallpox mortality was due to improved sanitation, not vaccination
Official statistics were misinterpreted or biased
Compulsory vaccination was unjust
Re-vaccination did not reliably prevent outbreaks
These views were strongly disputed, then and now.
Wallace had a strong distrust of medical authority
He and believed in:
Statistical reasoning
Social reform
Opposition to coercive government measures
The primacy of environmental and sanitary conditions in health
By ICNExcess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_Pandemic
Despite advances in modern information technology, the accuracy of data collection has not advanced in the United Kingdom for over 150 years,
because the same problems of erroneous data entry found then are still found now in the COVID pandemic,
not only in the UK but all over the world.
We have independently discovered the same UK data problem and solution for assessing COVID-19 vaccination as Alfred Russel Wallace had 150 years ago in investigating the consequences of Vaccination Acts starting in 1840 on smallpox:
The Alfred Russel Wallace as used by Wilson Sy
“Having thus cleared away the mass of doubtful or erroneous statistics,
depending on comparisons of the vaccinated and unvaccinated in limited areas or selected groups of patients,
we turn to the only really important evidence, those ‘masses of national experience’...”
https://archive.org/details/b21356336/page/n3/mode/2up
Alfred Russel Wallace, 1880s–1890s
1840 Vaccination Act
Provided free smallpox vaccination to the poor
Banned variolation
Vaccination compulsory in 1853, 1867
Why his interest?
C 1885
The Leicester Anti-Vaccination demonstrations (1885)
Growing public resistance to compulsory vaccination
Wallace’s increasing involvement in social reform and statistical arguments
Statistical critique of vaccination
Government data on:
Smallpox mortality trends before and after compulsory vaccination
Case mortality rates
Vaccination vs. sanitation effects
Mortality trends before and after each Act, 1853 and 1867
“Forty-Five Years of Registration Statistics, Proving Vaccination to Be Both Useless and Dangerous” (1885)
“Vaccination a Delusion; Its Penal Enforcement a Crime” (1898)
Contributions to the Royal Commission on Vaccination (1890–1896)
Wallace argued:
Declining smallpox mortality was due to improved sanitation, not vaccination
Official statistics were misinterpreted or biased
Compulsory vaccination was unjust
Re-vaccination did not reliably prevent outbreaks
These views were strongly disputed, then and now.
Wallace had a strong distrust of medical authority
He and believed in:
Statistical reasoning
Social reform
Opposition to coercive government measures
The primacy of environmental and sanitary conditions in health