
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Theis episode summarizes appellate court rulings regarding police searches, seizures, and the unlawful possession of firearms. Two cases from the Tenth Circuit evaluate whether officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct protective searches based on "furtive movements," gang affiliation, and proximity to crime scenes. While the court upheld a search in the McGregor case due to suspicious behavior during a traffic stop, it reversed a ruling in the Huerta case, finding that a "hunch" about a suspect's appearance did not justify a pat-down. Additionally, a Seventh Circuit opinion affirms a conviction in the Coleman case, determining that voluntary consent was given by a resident to enter a home during a domestic violence call. The courts also address and reject challenges to the constitutionality of the federal statute prohibiting felons from possessing weapons.
By Daniel W. SwearTheis episode summarizes appellate court rulings regarding police searches, seizures, and the unlawful possession of firearms. Two cases from the Tenth Circuit evaluate whether officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct protective searches based on "furtive movements," gang affiliation, and proximity to crime scenes. While the court upheld a search in the McGregor case due to suspicious behavior during a traffic stop, it reversed a ruling in the Huerta case, finding that a "hunch" about a suspect's appearance did not justify a pat-down. Additionally, a Seventh Circuit opinion affirms a conviction in the Coleman case, determining that voluntary consent was given by a resident to enter a home during a domestic violence call. The courts also address and reject challenges to the constitutionality of the federal statute prohibiting felons from possessing weapons.