Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share NRA Vs Vullo: Why The Supreme Court Decision Is More About The First Amendment Than The Second Amendment
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
NRA Vs Vullo: Why The Supreme Court Decision Is More About The First Amendment Than The Second Amendment
Michigan State University law professor Adam Candeub assesses the recent Supreme Court unanimous ruling in the NRA vs Vullo case. While the National Rifle Association was the plaintiff in the case, it was not about guns or the Second Amendment directly. It was more about First Amendment rights and whether government officials can use their positions to pressure businesses into conducting business (or not) in a specific way.
Form more information about Prof Candeub: https://www.law.msu.edu/faculty_staff/profile.php?prof=370
For more information about the case: https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/05/supreme-court-rules-for-nra-in-first-amendment-dispute/
View all episodes
By Mike Ferguson
5
55 ratings
Michigan State University law professor Adam Candeub assesses the recent Supreme Court unanimous ruling in the NRA vs Vullo case. While the National Rifle Association was the plaintiff in the case, it was not about guns or the Second Amendment directly. It was more about First Amendment rights and whether government officials can use their positions to pressure businesses into conducting business (or not) in a specific way.
Form more information about Prof Candeub: https://www.law.msu.edu/faculty_staff/profile.php?prof=370
For more information about the case: https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/05/supreme-court-rules-for-nra-in-first-amendment-dispute/