
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Nuclear power and nuclear weapons are policy realities in this current federal election. Both major parties support them in one way or another. The Leader of the Opposition has been open in saying a Coalition government would build nuclear reactors in Australia to replace “ageing coal power stations”. Both Labor and the Coalition are committed to AUKUS, which would see Australia supplied with eight nuclear-powered submarines, at a cost of approximately $360,000,000,000. Neither party is keen to discuss how they will store spent nuclear fuel, operational waste or the decommissioning of a sub’s reactor at the end of service life, although the waste will need to be stored in highly secured facilities for over 10,000 years and Australia does not have any such facility. Although nuclear waste volumes are relatively small, they remain dangerous for extremely long periods, requiring multi-generational planning and robust political and technical solutions.
By BEAM Mitchell Environment Group IncNuclear power and nuclear weapons are policy realities in this current federal election. Both major parties support them in one way or another. The Leader of the Opposition has been open in saying a Coalition government would build nuclear reactors in Australia to replace “ageing coal power stations”. Both Labor and the Coalition are committed to AUKUS, which would see Australia supplied with eight nuclear-powered submarines, at a cost of approximately $360,000,000,000. Neither party is keen to discuss how they will store spent nuclear fuel, operational waste or the decommissioning of a sub’s reactor at the end of service life, although the waste will need to be stored in highly secured facilities for over 10,000 years and Australia does not have any such facility. Although nuclear waste volumes are relatively small, they remain dangerous for extremely long periods, requiring multi-generational planning and robust political and technical solutions.