Send a text

When the court process keeps bending in the same direction, it stops being “mistake” and starts looking like system design. In this episode, I break down how Ohio court process can tilt outcomes through a burden shift, how “standard of review” becomes a shield, and why phrases like harmless error and “prove the prejudice” can protect bad procedure instead of correcting it. This is public accountability work—pro-cop, anti-corruption, and obsessed with the record. 🔍📄⚖️

I’m Scott Gardner—former cop, former homicide detective, former chief of police—and I’ve seen both sides of the courtroom. This series isn’t about hating police. It’s about clarity: if an officer is doing the job right, I’ll say it. If someone is out of line—policy violations, abuse of authority, or a process that’s rigged to preserve a conviction—then I want the facts on the table.
Segment one was the burden shift. Segment two was the expert line getting crossed. Segment three is what happens when you stack those problems together—then the system hides behind neutral-sounding standards after the damage is already in the jury’s head.

And yes—tips are flying in from all over the country. I appreciate every one of you. Keep sending receipts, documents, and verifiable info. Protect sources. Protect the record. Pressure the process.
Related: Ohio court process, appellate review standards, burden shift analysis, harmless error doctrine, prosecutor discretion

Subscribe to the channel.

Join Discord: https://liinks.co/the.infamous.exchief
www.theinfamousexchief.com
Hashtags:

#ProCopNotProCorruption #TheInfamousExChief #ShakeTheSystem

Support the show

Visit: https://www.liinks.co/the.infamous.exchief