<p>The Supreme Court granted applications to stay enforcement of EPA's "Good Neighbor Plan" rule against the applicants pending review in lower courts. The majority found the applicants were likely to succeed in arguing the rule was arbitrary and capricious because EPA failed to adequately explain why the rule could still be applied if fewer states were covered than originally planned.</p>

The Supreme Court granted applications to stay enforcement of EPA's "Good Neighbor Plan" rule against the applicants pending review in lower courts. The majority found the applicants were likely to succeed in arguing the rule was arbitrary and capricious because EPA failed to adequately explain why the rule could still be applied if fewer states were covered than originally planned.

Ohio et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Docket No. 23A349

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions shape the laws and lives of every American. Yet, understanding these rulings can be a challenge, often clouded by complex legal jargon and lengthy opinions. 9robes creates AI summaries of Supreme Court opinions using plain language and focuses on the facts.

Share Ohio et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Docket No. 23A349

Sign up to save your podcasts

Ohio et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Docket No. 23A349

Ohio et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Docket No. 23A349