In that he says, A Renewed Covenant, he has made the first old. Now that which decays and waxes old is ready to vanish away. IVRIYM (HEBREWS) 8:13

“NOW it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Kevar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of Elohiym.” In the fifth day of the month, which was the fifth year of King Yahuyakiyn's captivity, YECHEZQ'EL (EZEKIEL) 1:1-2

the timeline of captive at the timeline of 597 BCE. As it says here the fifth year of his captivity is depending upon what month from the year and date from 562 or 561 BCE. Taken into consideration after the time, Babylon's lost to Persia in 538 BC. And the forefathers did not fully come into their restoration place as they could or should have been.

So when you realize what they mean by the old testament, it is reference to this book here and its prophecies have been fulfilled, and none of the prophecies concerning the Old Testament are Noll and void. Or that it has already been accomplished and fulfilled. But we understand that a lot of the prophecies have not come in to Floracion and cannot be considered Noll and void. We also have to take into consideration who had established and stated that they were. .

And he said unto me, son of A'dam, thus says Adonai Yahuah; These are the ordinances of the altar in the day when they shall make it, to offer ascending smoke offerings thereon, and to sprinkle blood thereon. And you shall give to the priests the Leviyiym that be of the seed of Tsadoq, which approach unto me, to minister unto me, says Adonai Yahuah, a young bullock for a sin offering. YECHEZQ'EL (EZEKIEL) 43:18-19 we also know this has not come to pass. book

of Hosea

THEN said Yahuah unto me, Go yet, love a woman beloved of her friend, yet a woman who breaks wedlock, according to the love of Yahuah toward the children of Yashar'el, who look to other elohiym, and love flagons of wine. So I bought her to me for fifteen pieces of silver, and for a homer of barley, and a half homer of barley: And I said unto her, You shall abide for me many days; you shall not play the harlot, and you shall not be for another man: so will I also be for you. For the children of Yashar'el shall abide many days without a king, and without a prince, and without a sacrifice, and without an image, and without an ephod, and without Teraphiym: Afterward shall the children of Yashar'el return, and seek Yahuah Elohayhem, and את David their King; and shall fear El-Yahuah and his goodness in the latter days. HUSHA (HOSEA) 3:1-5 (cipher translation)

The direct translation from Hebrew states this: My son sat next Israel and ask Yahuah is their God David your king. The fear Yahuah our Yah, and bless him in the end the days

The book of HUSHA (HOSEA) that's talking for clear edification purposes and reasoning; we must understand the second temple was in existence during the time of Ezra and Nehemiah they were still under the hegemony rule of the of Persia.

That's why in Nehemiah chapter two he had to seek

permission from Darius to go back to Jerusalem. Which shows you that the Israelites were under the Persian rulership and not an independent governing body of sovereignty of their own. Just as we are today.. the next kingdom to rule over them was the Greeks and the Romans, just as stated in the book of Ezekiel. In those prophecies spoken to Hosea, would not take into account at his time, but at a later date. Which is why we often see prophecies, being spoken, or quoted as seal it up for a time, which means that the prophecy had no relevance in his time, but it needed to be written for future tense.

And the reason why we need this clarification is because we are told that the sacrifices were done away with, but it's clearly shown that the sacrifices will pick up again when Israel return into their homeland. So it's invalid to say that the sacrifices and offerings were done away with they were only supposed to be done away with for a time, but not completely.

And you shall put them upon Aharon your brother, and his sons with him; and shall anoint them, and consecrate them, and sanctify them, that they may minister unto me in the priest's office. SHEMOTH (EXODUS) 28:41

And in this context, the priest were anointed to fulfill a role in the term used here for the priestly office were Messiah‘s. Because they fit a roll of authority ordained by God. Into getting the basic understanding of people who is scribe to accept the old testament as a non-masonic is a misnomer.

misnomer (n.) mid-15c., in law, "an error in a name, mistaken identification of an accused or convicted person," from Anglo-French, Old French mesnomer "to misname, wrongly name," noun use of infinitive, from mes-"wrongly" (see mis- (2)) + nomer "to name," from Latin nominare"nominate" (see nominate). For noun use of French infinitives, see waiver. Meaning "act of applying a wrong name or designation" is from 1630s

Because we understand through out the old testament, they were many Messiah‘s. Therefore, is invalid to say the least.

THEN Shemu'el took a vial of oil, and poured it upon his head, and kissed him, and said, Is it not because Yahuah has anointed you to be captain over his inheritance? SHEMU'EL RI'SHON (1 SAMUEL) 10:1

Now Yahuah had told Shemu'el in his ear a day before Sha'ul came, saying, SHEMU'EL RI'SHON (1 SAMUEL) 9:15

Tomorrow about this time I will send you a man out of the land of Binyamiyn, and you shall anoint him to be captain over my people Yashar'el, that he may save my people out of the hand of the Pelishtiym: for I have looked upon my people, because their cry is come unto me. SHEMU'EL RI'SHON (1 SAMUEL) 9:16

Know when you look to the statement “I have looked on to my people because they cry and to me“ is something we are not seeing today. But it comes from the Hebrew word “Zaaq”