Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program with Boards – What Is Your Board’s Investigation Protocol
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program with Boards – What Is Your Board’s Investigation Protocol
Many companies have an investigation protocol in place when a potential Foreign Corruption Practices Act (FCPA) or other legal issue arises? However, many Boards of Directors do not have the same rigor when it comes to an investigation, which should be conducted or led by the Board itself. The consequences of this lack of foresight can be problematic, because if a Board of Directors does not get an investigation which it handles right, the consequences to the company, its reputation and value can all be quite severe.
In an article in the Corporate Board magazine, entitled “Successful Board Investigations”; David Bayless and Tammy Albarrán, wrote about five key goals that any investigation led by a Board of Directors must meet. They are:
Thoroughness - The authors believe that one of the key, and most critical, questions that any regulator might pose is just how thorough is an investigation; to test whether they can rely on the facts discovered without having to repeat the investigation themselves.
Objectivity - Here the authors write that any “investigation must follow the facts wherever they lead, regardless of the consequences.
Accuracy - As in any part of a best practices anti-corruption compliance program, the three most important things are Document, Document and Document. This means that the factual findings of an investigation must be well supported.
Timeliness - Certainly in the world of FCPA enforcement, an internal investigation should be done quickly. So timeliness is crucial.
Credibility - One of the realities of any FCPA investigation is that a Board of Directors led investigation is reviewed after the fact by not only skeptical third parties but also sometimes years after the initial events and investigation.
Three Key Takeaways
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
View all episodes
By Thomas Fox
5
11 ratings
Many companies have an investigation protocol in place when a potential Foreign Corruption Practices Act (FCPA) or other legal issue arises? However, many Boards of Directors do not have the same rigor when it comes to an investigation, which should be conducted or led by the Board itself. The consequences of this lack of foresight can be problematic, because if a Board of Directors does not get an investigation which it handles right, the consequences to the company, its reputation and value can all be quite severe.
In an article in the Corporate Board magazine, entitled “Successful Board Investigations”; David Bayless and Tammy Albarrán, wrote about five key goals that any investigation led by a Board of Directors must meet. They are:
Thoroughness - The authors believe that one of the key, and most critical, questions that any regulator might pose is just how thorough is an investigation; to test whether they can rely on the facts discovered without having to repeat the investigation themselves.
Objectivity - Here the authors write that any “investigation must follow the facts wherever they lead, regardless of the consequences.
Accuracy - As in any part of a best practices anti-corruption compliance program, the three most important things are Document, Document and Document. This means that the factual findings of an investigation must be well supported.
Timeliness - Certainly in the world of FCPA enforcement, an internal investigation should be done quickly. So timeliness is crucial.
Credibility - One of the realities of any FCPA investigation is that a Board of Directors led investigation is reviewed after the fact by not only skeptical third parties but also sometimes years after the initial events and investigation.
Three Key Takeaways
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices