Mark LoGalbo, Coverage Counsel for the Property & Liability Research Bureau (PLRB), delves into the “ongoing operations” limitation found in the ISO additional insured IO form.  Specifically, Mark discusses the dueling interpretations courts employ when interpreting the “ongoing operations” requirement in the context of a loss after the named insured has finished its work. Mark concludes by describing the insurance industry’s response to instances where the “ongoing operations” requirement is found to be ambiguous.