What happens when revenge porn meets the workplace? In this episode, Rebecca and Kim are joined by Stacey Nordwall (host of Toot or Boot and VP of People Strategy at PIN) to discuss a case that blurs every line between personal and professional.

An HR executive's Saturday morning email check reveals an anonymous complaint against a senior leader, complete with explicit photos and blackmail accusations. With the company in the middle of an acquisition, leadership must decide whether to support an employee who's the victim of a crime or protect the deal at all costs.

This story raises critical questions about risk management, at-will employment, work-life boundaries, and what companies owe employees when their personal lives become workplace liabilities through no fault of their own.

Show Notes:

The anatomy of workplace extortion

When personal matters become HR issues

Risk assessment during high-stakes business moments

At-will employment vs. wrongful termination

Supporting employees who are crime victims

Setting boundaries between work and weekend

Core HR Themes:

Personal vs. Professional Boundaries: Where does an employee's private life become the employer's concern?

Risk Assessment Under Pressure: Making high-stakes decisions during critical business moments

At-Will Employment Gray Areas: Legal vs. ethical termination decisions

Victim Treatment: How organizations respond when employees are targets of illegal activity

Crisis Management: Balancing company protection with employee support

Lessons for People Leaders:

Consult legal counsel before making termination decisions based on personal matters. This situation warranted immediate legal review, especially during an acquisition.

Consider alternatives to termination. Administrative leave would have given everyone time to assess the situation properly and allowed the employee to handle the criminal matter.

Don't negotiate with extortionists. Firing Bart gave the blackmailer exactly what she wanted and set a dangerous precedent.

Support employees who are crime victims. Bart was experiencing revenge porn and extortion. The company could have provided EAP resources and temporary leave instead of termination.

Question your assumptions about risk. Leadership assumed investors would react negatively, but many business leaders have faced personal scandals. A story of supporting an employee through criminal victimization could have been more compelling than appearing reactionary.

Protect work-life boundaries for yourself. Linda's Saturday email check turned into a weekend crisis. Some fires can wait until Monday.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices