If you’ve ever watched a simple query crawl in Microsoft Fabric—while your cloud bill climbs—you’re in the right place. Today, we’ll rewind to that moment of frustration and show you a real transformation: before and after Lakehouse optimization using partitioning, caching, and Delta Lake file management. What actually fixes sluggish performance, and what should you be doing differently right now? Let’s break down exactly how tuning these settings can speed up your analytics—and put those wasted costs back in your budget.When Good Queries Go Bad: The Pain of a Slow LakehouseIf you’ve ever watched a simple Power BI dashboard lag for what feels like forever—even though your data Lakehouse ticks all the supposed best practices boxes on paper—you’re not alone. Most admins and data engineers have faced this painful moment. You pull up what should be a plain routine report, and that spinning wheel just won’t quit. The more you wait, the more awkward the silence gets, especially if you’re sitting across the table from business leaders who expect crisp, on-demand answers. You can have all the right connectors, a shiny Fabric workspace, and every account set up perfectly, yet when that dashboard grinds to a halt, everyone looks at the data team like, “Didn’t we buy this to make things faster?”It’s a scenario that plays out in organizations of all shapes and sizes. Picture a live business review, where decision-makers toss out new questions and expect instant insights. But this meeting crawls along because every fresh question turns into a stonewall—your team nervously refreshes dashboards, and the queries just drag. Someone tries to defend the delays: “It worked fine yesterday,” or “Maybe it’s a network thing?” But by this point, the moment is lost and confidence in your Lakehouse—supposedly built to deliver analytics at scale—takes a hit. Underneath it all, you know the answer isn’t about more RAM, a faster network, or praying to the Microsoft gods. Something deeper in the setup is off.That’s a frustrating reality check for a lot of folks using Microsoft Fabric. You did all the homework—read the documentation, clicked through the intro guides, even went through official tutorials step-by-step. You’re investing not just budget but time and credibility into this thing. Yet the speed is crawling and your usage costs keep climbing with every refresh. The business side starts asking pointed questions about resource usage. “We’re using the cloud, shouldn’t it be faster?” That budget for extra analytics headcount? It’s slowly evaporating into compute charges for reports no one is happy with.The most common trap looks deceptively simple: a basic sales report, running over a Lakehouse table that looks organized but isn’t set up to scale. Maybe it’s partitioned by the default ‘date’ column, maybe it’s just one big file. You press refresh, and suddenly the query engine has to read through a mountain of irrelevant data to get to those two weeks of sales your VP actually cares about. The table was probably ingested with one-size-fits-all defaults. Maybe it’s built from flat files, all crammed into the same folder or, worse, written out with every new ETL load in a single drop. None of these mistakes jump out at you when you’re small, but once you hit any kind of scale, reports that should finish in seconds can take minutes—or worse, never finish at all.It’s a pattern that keeps showing up: teams stick with out-of-the-box settings, avoid rethinking ingestion, and put off cleaning up their data structure because everything sort of “works” during initial testing. Add some growth and a few extra users and suddenly you’re just spinning wheels. Microsoft’s analytics team actually studied this and found something wild—up to 80% of Lakehouse performance issues came from the same handful of missteps baked in right at setup. We’re talking about stuff that never gets fixed because it’s invisible until real usage hits. The result? Your Lakehouse is like a race car stuck with the parking brake on. You’re throwing money at bigger engines—more compute, maybe even another consultant to run some scripts—but you still aren’t getting anywhere near the performance you expected.What if you could pinpoint just three moves that unlock double-digit speed improvements—not by throwing more hardware or budget at the problem, but by tuning features you already have? Imagine the difference: instead of burning through your cloud budget on slow queries, you see instant refreshes and happy users. Those cost spikes flatten out, and surprise tickets about slow dashboards get a lot less frequent. For a lot of Lakehouse admins, that leap in performance is completely within their reach—all it takes is knowing where the slowdowns start, and how to fix them without tearing everything apart.So yes, the pain is real—those slow dashboards, awkward meetings, and climbing costs add up fast. But there’s nothing mysterious or magical about the solution. Over the next few minutes, we’ll break down exactly what’s holding your Fabric Lakehouse back and how to flip the script, step by step. Because whether it’s partitioning strategies, caching, or the files themselves, there’s a fix for every common bottleneck if you know where to look. Let’s get into it and tackle the very first pitfall that trips up almost every Fabric Lakehouse out there—partitioning strategies that sabotage you right from the start.Partitioning Pitfalls: The Hidden Cost of One-Size-Fits-AllYou might think you’ve got partitioning handled—set up some keys, run your ingestion, and move on. But Fabric has a way of exposing every assumption about data splits. Most admins default to partitioning by dates or regions, making a guess based on how tables were modeled or what made sense for last year’s reporting structure. There’s comfort in picking a field like ‘date’ and letting the system slice up everything for you—especially if you’re used to working on-prem or with more traditional warehouse tools. The real problem starts when that habit collides with the way your teams actually use the data. Fabric treats partitions differently under the hood. A partition can help, but when it’s picked for convenience rather than workload, it often becomes a liability. Imagine a sales table split into one folder per year, stretching all the way from 2005 to today. But here’s the catch: 90% of your queries filter not by year, but by ‘product category’. So when someone asks to see all sales for a single product, the engine has to load every year, every partition, just to find the relevant records. What should’ve been a targeted scan turns into a painfully broad search. That’s not just wasted time—it’s an avoidable cost every single month.There’s another side to this story, too. It’s easy to go overboard on partitioning, especially when there’s a fear of slow jobs or overloaded clusters. Say you try to cover every angle and create much finer partitions: maybe one per day, per region, per product category, per sales channel—so many combinations that you end up with tens of thousands of tiny files scattered in your Lakehouse. Each one takes up storage space, each one adds an overhead for the engine to scan, validate, and open. Instead of narrowing the work, you’ve just multiplied it. Fabric’s storage costs start to creep, and what used to be a single-table read becomes a coordination nightmare of hunting down fragmented rows. That’s the story most teams live out at least once: under-partition and you force massive, expensive scans; over-partition, you drown yourself in metadata and drag everything down to a crawl. Tracking down the sweet spot isn’t just nice to have—it’s essential for sustainable performance and predictable costs. The difference can be huge. Poorly chosen partition keys can double query times and push costs up by as much as 60%. It adds up fast, especially for organizations with growing data and regular refreshes. Storage isn’t free, and neither is time spent by your team fixing slowdowns that never should have existed in the first place.Here’s the real kicker: default partitioning patterns might look familiar, but they’re not built for your actual business questions. Microsoft’s own data architects put it bluntly—‘default’ partitioning is usually the wrong answer for custom workloads. Their point is simple: if you always split by date because the documentation suggests it, you’re almost guaranteed to hit performance walls when your queries don’t follow that same logic. The documentation can get you started, but it won’t know how your business users think, or what questions come up in real meetings.Not long ago, I worked with a client whose team inherited a Lakehouse built entirely around partitions by ‘region’. Every table was split that way, top to bottom. It seemed logical—the business had always organized sales targets by region. But in practice, nearly all their dashboards filtered and aggregated by ‘order_type’. Regional splits meant that every refresh and ad hoc query had to grab pieces from all over the place, scan unnecessary files, and reassemble everything on the fly. Performance dropped off a cliff anytime there was a spike in questions. The fix? They rebuilt partitions around ‘order_type’ instead. Night and day difference. Not only did the refresh window shrink to half its original length, but their query costs stabilized and predictable performance returned. The only thing they changed was how data lined up with what end users actually asked for in real life.If there’s one lesson from all this, it’s that partition keys should never be on autopilot. The best choice always comes from your workload and query patterns, not the data model itself or what makes a table look neat on disk. Before you launch that next ETL pipeline, ask when and how the table is queried—not just how it will be written. Sit with your business analysts, check historical query logs, and figure out which columns they filter on. That’s

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.