Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Oral Argument: CFPB v. Community Financial Services Assn. of America, Ltd. | Case No. 22-448 | Date Argued: 10/3/23 | Date Decided: 4/16/24
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Oral Argument: CFPB v. Community Financial Services Assn. of America, Ltd. | Case No. 22-448 | Date Argued: 10/3/23 | Date Decided: 4/16/24
Case Info: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Assn. of America, Ltd. | Case No. 22-448 | Date Argued: 10/3/23 | Date Decided: 4/16/24
Question Presented: Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the statute providing funding to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), 12 U.S.C. 5497, violates the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const. Art. I,§ 9, Cl. 7, and in vacating a regulation promulgated at a time when the CFPB was receiving such funding.
Holding: Congress' statutory authorization allowing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to draw money from the earnings of the Federal Reserve System to carry out the bureau's duties, 12 U.S.C. § 5497(a)(l)-(2), satisfies the appropriations clause.
Result: Reversed and remanded.
Voting Breakdown: 7-2. Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson joined. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett joined. Justice Jackson filed a concurring opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
- For Petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
- For Respondents: Noel J. Francisco, Washington, D.C.
View all episodes
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments
4.3
66 ratings
Case Info: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Assn. of America, Ltd. | Case No. 22-448 | Date Argued: 10/3/23 | Date Decided: 4/16/24
Question Presented: Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the statute providing funding to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), 12 U.S.C. 5497, violates the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const. Art. I,§ 9, Cl. 7, and in vacating a regulation promulgated at a time when the CFPB was receiving such funding.
Holding: Congress' statutory authorization allowing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to draw money from the earnings of the Federal Reserve System to carry out the bureau's duties, 12 U.S.C. § 5497(a)(l)-(2), satisfies the appropriations clause.
Result: Reversed and remanded.
Voting Breakdown: 7-2. Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson joined. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett joined. Justice Jackson filed a concurring opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
- For Petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
- For Respondents: Noel J. Francisco, Washington, D.C.
More shows like The High Court Report
View all
The NPR Politics Podcast
25,875 Listeners
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
3,533 Listeners
Bloomberg Law
372 Listeners
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
695 Listeners
We the People
1,118 Listeners
The Fifth Column
2,888 Listeners
The Lawfare Podcast
6,296 Listeners
The Daily
112,617 Listeners
Stay Tuned with Preet
32,371 Listeners
Today, Explained
10,240 Listeners
Interesting Times with Ross Douthat
7,071 Listeners
Strict Scrutiny
5,776 Listeners
Advisory Opinions
3,882 Listeners
The Ezra Klein Show
16,081 Listeners
Divided Argument
738 Listeners