
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Oral Argument: Connelly v. United States | Case No. 23-146 | Date Argued: 3/27/24 | Date Decided: 6/6/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Background:
Closely held corporations often enter into agreements requiring the redemption of a shareholder's stock after the shareholder's death in order to preserve the closely held nature of the business. Corporations that enter such agreements often purchase life insurance on the shareholder in order to fund the transaction.
Question Presented: Whether the proceeds of a life-insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder's stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder's shares for purposes of the federal estate tax.
Holding: A corporation's contractual obligation to redeem shares is not necessarily a liability that reduces a corporation's value for purposes of the federal estate tax.
Result: Affirmed.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Thomas delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:
By SCOTUS Oral Arguments4.3
66 ratings
Oral Argument: Connelly v. United States | Case No. 23-146 | Date Argued: 3/27/24 | Date Decided: 6/6/24
Link to Docket: Here.
Background:
Closely held corporations often enter into agreements requiring the redemption of a shareholder's stock after the shareholder's death in order to preserve the closely held nature of the business. Corporations that enter such agreements often purchase life insurance on the shareholder in order to fund the transaction.
Question Presented: Whether the proceeds of a life-insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder's stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder's shares for purposes of the federal estate tax.
Holding: A corporation's contractual obligation to redeem shares is not necessarily a liability that reduces a corporation's value for purposes of the federal estate tax.
Result: Affirmed.
Voting Breakdown: 9-0. Justice Thomas delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
Link to Opinion: Here.
Oral Advocates:

25,875 Listeners

3,533 Listeners

372 Listeners

695 Listeners

1,118 Listeners

2,888 Listeners

6,296 Listeners

112,617 Listeners

32,371 Listeners

10,240 Listeners

7,071 Listeners

5,776 Listeners

3,882 Listeners

16,081 Listeners

738 Listeners