
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


23-719 TRUMP V. ANDERSON
QUESTION PRESENTED: The Supreme Court of Colorado held that President Donald J. Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President because he "engaged in insurrection" against the Constitution of the United States-and that he did so after taking an oath "as an officer of the United States" to "support" the Constitution. The state supreme court ruled that the Colorado Secretary of State should not list President Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot or count any write-in votes cast for him. The state supreme court stayed its decision pending United States Supreme Court review. The question presented is: Did the Colorado Supreme Court err in ordering President Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot?
There is a per curiam opinion for a unanimous Court. Barrett, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, JJ. concurred in the judgment.
QP - 00:22
Per Curiam Opinion - 01:15
Concurrence by Barrett, J. - 22:20
Concurrence by Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, JJ. - 23:21
For comments or suggestions, please email [email protected].
By Rafael Kriger5
11 ratings
23-719 TRUMP V. ANDERSON
QUESTION PRESENTED: The Supreme Court of Colorado held that President Donald J. Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President because he "engaged in insurrection" against the Constitution of the United States-and that he did so after taking an oath "as an officer of the United States" to "support" the Constitution. The state supreme court ruled that the Colorado Secretary of State should not list President Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot or count any write-in votes cast for him. The state supreme court stayed its decision pending United States Supreme Court review. The question presented is: Did the Colorado Supreme Court err in ordering President Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot?
There is a per curiam opinion for a unanimous Court. Barrett, J., filed a concurring opinion. Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, JJ. concurred in the judgment.
QP - 00:22
Per Curiam Opinion - 01:15
Concurrence by Barrett, J. - 22:20
Concurrence by Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, JJ. - 23:21
For comments or suggestions, please email [email protected].