
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


US markets were closed on Monday for Presidents’ Day after an unusually uneventful weekend on the newswires. Asian and European equities were quiet, but gold, silver and crypto all continued to skid lower and futures trading indicated a shaky open for Wall Street the next day.
The rotation out of certain tech sectors resumed on Tuesday morning and the indexes in general, but the NASDAQ in particular, stumbled out of the gate. Selected software, logistics and real estate names were still being viewed as potential longer term victims of AI and as such remained in Wall Street’s crosshairs at the opening bell.
A positive turnaround kicked in at lunchtime that saw the indexes eventually close unchanged on the day, but it was put down to dip-buyers and bottom-fishers swooping in rather than any real alleviation of the concerns that are at the root of the current price fragility. Meanwhile, European stocks reached more new all-time record highs, emphasizing the US stock market’s worst start to a year relative to other global stock markets since 1995.
We got a big economic data dump on Wednesday morning, showing that industrial production jumped by the most in almost a year, that housing starts hit a five-month high and that durable goods orders declined in line with expectations.
The minutes from the Fed’s most recent rate-setting meeting revealed that most committee members appear to have little appetite for cutting the Fed Funds Rate again any time soon, believing that downside risks to employment have moderated while the threat of persistent inflation remains, particularly following confirmation from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of multiple reports showing that American consumers and businesses are bearing 90%+ of all tariff costs.
The bargain-hunting continued with some disproportionate buying of the most recently-damaged names with a sense that the tech punishment meted out by traders recently may have been overdone. The stock indexes finished moderately higher.
The US trade deficit has now ballooned to its widest level since the 1960s as data released on Thursday morning showed that exports fell hard and imports rocketed, pushing back hard against the happy-clappy narrative being pushed by the administration. Increased geopolitical concerns in and around Iran also dampened enthusiasm by spiking oil prices again and the indexes took a dive.
We learned from pre-market releases on Friday that PCE annual inflation in December rose to 2.9% and that the latest (shutdown-impacted) Q4 GDP growth estimate crashed from 4.4% to 1.4%.
But the big news came at 10am ET when the Supreme Court struck down and overturned most of Trump’s tariffs (all of those under the IEEPA statute) by ruling that he broke the law when he imposed them, opening the door to utter chaos as companies and countries seek to swiftly drain the US Treasury of up to $170 billion in refunds for illegally-charged tariffs and international trade deals were immediately invalidated.
A scorned Trump went completely off the rails, slamming Supreme Court justices as "fools and lapdogs" who had been influenced by foreign “slimeballs” and lashed out by instantly imposing a new snap 10% (non-IEEPA) tariff on the entire world, which he later raised to 15%.
Amazingly, stock prices barely responded, moving somewhat higher on the rather dubious idea that this was some kind of tariff reprieve while seemingly not showing much concern about the sheer mayhem that could be generated by the ruling and the notoriously thin-skinned and impulsive president's highly unpredictable potential responses, particularly right before a State Of The Union speech on Tuesday (where, interestingly, protocol dictates a handshake between Trump and all the Supreme Court justices!) and with the US military poised to strike Iran on his say-so.
The stock indexes closed in the green for the week but this upcoming five days has firestorm potential, including Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
* Holding an index long term using an ETF or mutual fund is not as static an investment as you might think. Since 1985, 365 companies have lost their place in the S&P 500 and been replaced, an almost 75% turnover averaging about 9 ejections per year. This self-adjustment benefits long term investors over extended periods of time by adapting their holdings according to what is happening in the economy without a need for them to guesstimate when to make sell and buy decisions. Holding an individual stock is a completely static investment that involves market amateurs needing to play the fool’s game of making the kind of timing judgments that even highly-paid full-time market professionals routinely fail at.
* Alphabet/Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta have now lost a combined $1 trillion in value since their latest quarterly earnings releases. Wall Street is showing signs of falling out of love with some of the names that have worked so well for years as rising spending fuels fears that these companies are building too much, too fast. This doesn’t mean that the three-year old bull market in stocks is over or that the tech sector is suddenly a bad investment, but it does mean we should anticipate likely heightened volatility.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Replacing facts with noise is an awful way to manage your money.” Ritholtz’s Tony Isola urges us not to mistake discomfort for danger.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“It’s no longer the case that the company that spends the most on AI infrastructure wins”
Tom Essaye, founder and president, Sevens Report
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta) ⬆︎ 1.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Costco) ⬇︎ 1.8% for the week
* SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.1% last week, is up 1.1% so far this year and ended the week 1.2% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
* IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.6% last week, is up 7.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.6% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
* VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.2% last week, is up 10.5% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
* FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
* PRIME RATE ** ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
* 3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.69% (3.68% a week ago)
* 2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.48% (3.40% a week ago)
* 5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.65% (3.61% a week ago)
* 10 YEAR TREASURY *** ⬆︎ 4.08% (4.04% a week ago)
* 20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.66% (4.64% a week ago)
* 30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.72% (4.69% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
** Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.
*** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
* ⬇︎ 6.01%
One week ago: 6.09%, one month ago: 6.08%, one year ago: 6.85%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
* Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 96% probability (90% a week ago)
* 0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 4% probability (10% a week ago)
When is the most commonly-expected month of the next Fed Funds interest rate cut?
* June (unchanged from a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
* ⬌ Two (unchanged from a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool and Polymarket as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
* ⬆︎ 66%
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 59%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | [email protected] | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?
By Simon Brady CFP®US markets were closed on Monday for Presidents’ Day after an unusually uneventful weekend on the newswires. Asian and European equities were quiet, but gold, silver and crypto all continued to skid lower and futures trading indicated a shaky open for Wall Street the next day.
The rotation out of certain tech sectors resumed on Tuesday morning and the indexes in general, but the NASDAQ in particular, stumbled out of the gate. Selected software, logistics and real estate names were still being viewed as potential longer term victims of AI and as such remained in Wall Street’s crosshairs at the opening bell.
A positive turnaround kicked in at lunchtime that saw the indexes eventually close unchanged on the day, but it was put down to dip-buyers and bottom-fishers swooping in rather than any real alleviation of the concerns that are at the root of the current price fragility. Meanwhile, European stocks reached more new all-time record highs, emphasizing the US stock market’s worst start to a year relative to other global stock markets since 1995.
We got a big economic data dump on Wednesday morning, showing that industrial production jumped by the most in almost a year, that housing starts hit a five-month high and that durable goods orders declined in line with expectations.
The minutes from the Fed’s most recent rate-setting meeting revealed that most committee members appear to have little appetite for cutting the Fed Funds Rate again any time soon, believing that downside risks to employment have moderated while the threat of persistent inflation remains, particularly following confirmation from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of multiple reports showing that American consumers and businesses are bearing 90%+ of all tariff costs.
The bargain-hunting continued with some disproportionate buying of the most recently-damaged names with a sense that the tech punishment meted out by traders recently may have been overdone. The stock indexes finished moderately higher.
The US trade deficit has now ballooned to its widest level since the 1960s as data released on Thursday morning showed that exports fell hard and imports rocketed, pushing back hard against the happy-clappy narrative being pushed by the administration. Increased geopolitical concerns in and around Iran also dampened enthusiasm by spiking oil prices again and the indexes took a dive.
We learned from pre-market releases on Friday that PCE annual inflation in December rose to 2.9% and that the latest (shutdown-impacted) Q4 GDP growth estimate crashed from 4.4% to 1.4%.
But the big news came at 10am ET when the Supreme Court struck down and overturned most of Trump’s tariffs (all of those under the IEEPA statute) by ruling that he broke the law when he imposed them, opening the door to utter chaos as companies and countries seek to swiftly drain the US Treasury of up to $170 billion in refunds for illegally-charged tariffs and international trade deals were immediately invalidated.
A scorned Trump went completely off the rails, slamming Supreme Court justices as "fools and lapdogs" who had been influenced by foreign “slimeballs” and lashed out by instantly imposing a new snap 10% (non-IEEPA) tariff on the entire world, which he later raised to 15%.
Amazingly, stock prices barely responded, moving somewhat higher on the rather dubious idea that this was some kind of tariff reprieve while seemingly not showing much concern about the sheer mayhem that could be generated by the ruling and the notoriously thin-skinned and impulsive president's highly unpredictable potential responses, particularly right before a State Of The Union speech on Tuesday (where, interestingly, protocol dictates a handshake between Trump and all the Supreme Court justices!) and with the US military poised to strike Iran on his say-so.
The stock indexes closed in the green for the week but this upcoming five days has firestorm potential, including Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday.
Some other things I’m thinking about ..
* Holding an index long term using an ETF or mutual fund is not as static an investment as you might think. Since 1985, 365 companies have lost their place in the S&P 500 and been replaced, an almost 75% turnover averaging about 9 ejections per year. This self-adjustment benefits long term investors over extended periods of time by adapting their holdings according to what is happening in the economy without a need for them to guesstimate when to make sell and buy decisions. Holding an individual stock is a completely static investment that involves market amateurs needing to play the fool’s game of making the kind of timing judgments that even highly-paid full-time market professionals routinely fail at.
* Alphabet/Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Meta have now lost a combined $1 trillion in value since their latest quarterly earnings releases. Wall Street is showing signs of falling out of love with some of the names that have worked so well for years as rising spending fuels fears that these companies are building too much, too fast. This doesn’t mean that the three-year old bull market in stocks is over or that the tech sector is suddenly a bad investment, but it does mean we should anticipate likely heightened volatility.
I was recently interviewed by Vetta-Fi who host the annual Exchange ETF conference in Las Vegas about my practice. You can read the interview here.
If you are not yet a financial planning or investment management client of Anglia Advisors and would like to explore becoming one, please feel free to reach out to arrange a complimentary no-obligation discovery call with me.
ARTICLE OF THE WEEK ..
“Replacing facts with noise is an awful way to manage your money.” Ritholtz’s Tony Isola urges us not to mistake discomfort for danger.
.. AND I QUOTE ..
“It’s no longer the case that the company that spends the most on AI infrastructure wins”
Tom Essaye, founder and president, Sevens Report
LAST WEEK BY THE NUMBERS:
Last week’s market color courtesy of finviz.com
Last week’s best performing US sector: Communication Services (two biggest holdings: Alphabet/Google, Meta) ⬆︎ 1.9% for the week
Last week’s worst performing US sector: Consumer Defensive (two biggest holdings: Walmart, Costco) ⬇︎ 1.8% for the week
* SPY, a US Large Cap ETF, tracks the S&P 500 index, made up of 500 stocks from a universe of the largest US companies. Its price rose 1.1% last week, is up 1.1% so far this year and ended the week 1.2% below its all-time record closing high (01/27/2026).
* IWM, a US Small Cap ETF, tracks the Russell 2000 index, made up of the bottom two-thirds in terms of company size of a universe of 3,000 of the largest US stocks. Its price rose 0.6% last week, is up 7.5% so far this year and ended the week 2.6% below its all-time record closing high (01/22/2026).
* VXUS, a Global Non-US ETF, tracks the MSCI ACWI Ex-US index, made up of over 8,500 of the largest names from a universe of stocks issued by companies from around the world excluding the United States, in both developed and emerging markets. Its price rose 1.2% last week, is up 10.5% so far this year and ended the week at its all-time record closing high.
INTEREST RATES:
* FED FUNDS RATE * ⬌ 3.625% (unchanged from a week ago)
* PRIME RATE ** ⬌ 6.75% (unchanged from a week ago)
* 3 MONTH TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.69% (3.68% a week ago)
* 2 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.48% (3.40% a week ago)
* 5 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 3.65% (3.61% a week ago)
* 10 YEAR TREASURY *** ⬆︎ 4.08% (4.04% a week ago)
* 20 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.66% (4.64% a week ago)
* 30 YEAR TREASURY ⬆︎ 4.72% (4.69% a week ago)
Data courtesy of the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury as of the market close on Friday
* Decided upon by the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee at periodic meetings 8x a year. Used as a basis for overnight interbank loans and for determining high yield savings interest rates.
** Wall Street Journal Prime Rate as of Friday’s close. Tending to move in lockstep with the Fed Funds Rate, this measure is used as a basis for determining certain consumer loan interest rates such as credit cards, auto loans, personal loans, home equity loans/lines of credit and securities-based lending.
*** Used as a basis for determining mortgage interest rates and some business loans
AVERAGE 30-YEAR FIXED MORTGAGE RATE:
* ⬇︎ 6.01%
One week ago: 6.09%, one month ago: 6.08%, one year ago: 6.85%
Data courtesy of the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey
INTEREST RATE EXPECTATIONS:
Where will the Fed Funds interest rate be after the next rate-setting meeting on March 18th?
* Unchanged from now .. ⬆︎ 96% probability (90% a week ago)
* 0.25% lower than now .. ⬇︎ 4% probability (10% a week ago)
When is the most commonly-expected month of the next Fed Funds interest rate cut?
* June (unchanged from a week ago)
With seven more rate-setting meetings in 2026, what is the most commonly-expected number of remaining 0.25% Fed Funds interest rate cuts this year?
* ⬌ Two (unchanged from a week ago)
Data courtesy of CME FedWatch Tool and Polymarket as of the market close on Friday.
All data based on the Fed Funds interest rate (currently 3.625%).
PERCENT OF S&P 500 STOCKS ABOVE THEIR OWN 200-DAY MOVING AVERAGE:
* ⬆︎ 66%
One week ago: 65%, one month ago: 63%, one year ago: 59%
Data courtesy of MacroMicro as of Friday’s market close
This widely-used technical measure of market breadth is considered to be a very robust indicator of the overall health of the S&P 500 index.
A high percentage (above 70%) generally suggests broad market strength and a bullish trend, while a low percentage (below 30%) may indicate market weakness and a bearish trend.
FEAR & GREED INDEX:
“Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful.” Warren Buffett.
Data courtesy of CNN Business as of Friday’s market close
The Fear & Greed Index from CNN Business can be used as an attempt to gauge whether or not stocks are fairly priced and to determine the mood of the market. It is a compilation of seven of the most important indicators that measure different aspects of stock market behavior. They are: market momentum, stock price strength, stock price breadth, put and call option ratio, junk bond demand, market volatility and safe haven demand.
Extreme Fear readings can lead to potential opportunities as investors may have driven prices “too low” from a possibly excessive risk-off negative sentiment.
Extreme Greed readings can be associated with possibly too-frothy prices and a sense of “FOMO” with investors chasing rallies in an excessively risk-on environment . This overcrowded positioning leaves the market potentially vulnerable to a sharp downward reversal at some point.
A “sweet spot” is considered to be in the lower-to-mid “Greed” zone.
Anglia Advisors recently updated its Privacy Policy. You can view the latest version here.
WWW.ANGLIAADVISORS.COM | [email protected] | CALL OR TEXT: (646) 286 0290 | FOLLOW ANGLIA ADVISORS ON INSTAGRAM
This material represents a highly opinionated, speculative assessment of the financial market environment based on assumptions and prevailing information and data at a specific point in time and is always subject to change at any time. Although the content is believed to be correct at the time of publication, no warranty of its accuracy or completeness is ever given. It is never to be interpreted as an attempt to forecast any future events, nor does it offer any kind of guarantee whatsoever of future results, circumstances or outcomes.
The material contained herein is not necessarily complete and is also wholly insufficient to be relied upon as research or investment advice or as a sole basis for any financial determinations, including investment decisions or making any kind of consumer choices, without further consultation with Anglia Advisors or other fully-qualified Registered Investment Advisor. The user assumes the entire risk of any decisions made or actions taken based in whole or in part on any of the information provided in this or any other Anglia Advisors published content.
Under no circumstances is any Anglia Advisors’ content ever intended to constitute tax, legal or medical advice and should never be taken as such. Neither the information contained nor any opinion expressed herein constitutes a solicitation for the purchase of any security or asset class. No formal client advice may be rendered by Anglia Advisors unless and until a properly-executed client engagement agreement is in place.
Posts may contain links or references to third party websites or may post data or graphics from them for the convenience and interest of readers. While Anglia Advisors might have reason to believe in the quality of the content provided on these sites, the firm has no control over, and is not in any way responsible for, the accuracy of such content nor for the security or privacy protocols that external sites may or may not employ. By making use of such links, the user assumes, in its entirety, any kind of risk associated with accessing them or making use of any information provided therein.
Those associated with Anglia Advisors, including clients with managed or advised investments, may maintain positions in securities and/or asset classes mentioned in this post.
If you enjoyed this post, why not share it with someone?