🏛️ The Strategic Patent Nightmare

🌟 Imagine being an inventor defending your breakthrough, only to face attacks on the same patent in multiple courts simultaneously. Sounds like a legal headache? It's actually a strategic nightmare that the law specifically prevents!

💡 What You'll Discover:

• 🔍 Why patent law forces you to "choose your weapon" - no double-dipping allowed
• ⚖️ The "first come, first served" principle that determines which legal path survives
• 🎯 How post-grant opposition can eclipse all other cancellation options
• ⚡ Why strategic mistakes can cost you your entire legal case

🚀 Real Cases Discussed:

• 💎 Dr. Aloys Wobben vs. Yogesh Mehra & Others - The wind turbine case that defined multiple proceedings rules
• ⭐ Enercon India's dual strategy - How trying to fight on two fronts backfired spectacularly

🎭 Key Legal Weapons Explained:

• 📋 Section 64 of Patent Act 1970 - The "either-or" rule that changed everything
• 🛡️ IPAB revocation petitions vs. High Court counter-claims
• ⚔️ Section 25(2) post-grant opposition - The trump card that beats all others

🎙️ This episode reveals how one word in the law - "or" - can make or break million-dollar patent strategies. Perfect for anyone who wants to understand why legal precision matters in the real world!