Scientific data can be interpreted in numerous ways, and while data may be objective, different scientific and value perspectives shape the way we individually interept information. These interpretations are not always congruent, leading to scientific disagreements over the meaning of results. Associate Professor Elena Rocca, along with her collegue Rani Lill Anjum, believe that philosophy has a role to play in navigating these scientific disagreements. Elena talks about her role in developing a university course that applies philosophical thinking to scientific disagreements.

Resources

PHI300 Course Description

Philosophy of Biology: Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid. 2019. F Andersen, RL Anjum, E Rocca