Peninsula Health Alliance Timeline

I'll create a detailed timeline of email correspondence from the documents you've provided. This will help organize the communications in chronological order to better understand the sequence of events.

Timeline of Email Correspondence - Jefferson Healthcare OMC Partnership Proposal

February 5, 2025 Commission Executive Session

During this executive session, Commissioner Ready was informed for the first time about the Peninsula Health Alliance proposal.  He was told:

1. The CEO wanted board approval to draft and submit a proposal by tuesday March 11.
2. The basic structure of the alliance would include creation of a non profit and super board above both public hospital districts OMC and Jefferson.
3. The super board will have an executive director over everything.  When asked by Ready what the process would be like selecting and hiring that executive director, how would that Executive relate to the CEO/Administrator of each separate hospital district, Ready was told:  
   1. “I think you will find OMC’s board ready and willing to make Mike Glenn the executive director” of the super board.  This was said by Mike Glenn and all other commissioners seemed thrilled and on board with this plan.
4. I asked if CEO MIke Glenn was looking for some sort of approval today from the board to proceed, Mike Glenn responded, “yes.”  I indicated we cannot vote so we cannot express approval or disapproval.
5. Commissioner Matt Ready:  “I did not consent or approve of this proposal moving forward- as it immediately raised numerous red flags for me.  (I tried to keep an open mind for the possibilities.)”

February 6, 2025

Shannon Groff sends calendar invitation for "Check In: Kees, Mike & Pranav" meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 6, 2025, 4:00-4:50 PM.

February 7, 2025

10:02 AM - Pranav Sharma to Kees Kolff (cc: Shannon Groff, Mike Glenn)

Good Morning Kees,

It was a pleasure connecting with you yesterday afternoon and thank you for your time/insights.

Per our discussion, sharing an updated draft with you for your input -- looking forward to hearing your thoughts on governance and structure.

Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Thank you kindly,

Pranav

11:57 AM - Kees Kolff to Pranav Sharma (cc: Shannon Groff, Mike Glenn)

Thanks Pranav.

I downloaded and will work on one of the files you sent this weekend.

The second one looks the same, or did I miss something?

Looks like great work so far.

Cheers, Kees

12:20 PM - Pranav Sharma to Kees Kolff (cc: Shannon Groff, Mike Glenn)

Hey Kees,

Sorry for the confusion there should only be one file/email sent -- if you got two they are both the same. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

Have a great weekend,

Pranav

February 8, 2025

8:57 AM - Kees Kolff to Pranav Sharma (cc: Mike Glenn, Shannon Groff, Commissioners)

Hello Pranav,

Thanks for the conversation with Mike about this exciting possible alliance the other day, and thanks for the opportunity to share some ideas for edits on the organizational chart and the governance comments that go along with that.

I have attached a reworded narrative. There were too many edits to make "show changes" useful. I have also attached a photo of a very quickly sketched org chart.

I am not attached to anything I have created and merely make them available for you to use as you see fit.

I am copying the rest of the board members, and perhaps if they have comments they can submit them to you (But not to me since we don't want to violate any laws).

Once again, it's a pleasure working with you on this project.

Let me know if there is any other way I can help.

Respectfully, Kees

February 9, 2025

5:41 PM - Pranav Sharma to Kees Kolff (cc: Mike Glenn, Shannon Groff, Commissioners)

Good Evening Kees,

Thank you for your input and feedback here. This is greatly appreciated, and looking forward to working with Mike to get them integrated appropriately.

Look forward to hearing from the rest of the Commissioners on any inputs or iterations. We will be sure to keep you all posted on final drafts as we continue to update.

It's always a pleasure collaborating!

Thank you kindly,

Pranav

February 11, 2025

9:32 AM - Matt Ready to Pranav Sharma

Hi Pranav,

Were the other commissioners sent these proposal drafts? I was not. Is there something for me to review?

Matt

February 12, 2025

9:26 AM - Matt Ready to Mike Glenn, Commissioners, Shannon Groff (Subject: Communication to all commissioners)

Hello Commissioners,

I requested a copy of any proposal sent to OMC. I received a reply from Jill that she too would like to see it.

I have not received anything clearly about this proposal or the actual wording.

It seems I was accidently included in an exchange between Commissioner Kolff and Pranav Sharma which included a copy of the PHA Proposal and Kees' feedback.

I believe all commissioners need to see a copy of the proposal that was sent to OMC. I would like to know if this proposal copy I was sent is the final version.

All commissioners please do not respond to me. I already feel like the amount of back communication going on about this proposal outside of an open public meeting is highly problematic and likely a serial meeting.

The executive session we had did not discuss any realestate purchase or potential litigation. It only discussed this proposal- which arguably is not at all a valid reason for an executive session.

Can we please proceed forward with this and all topics obeying executive session laws and open public meeting laws against serial meetings, - so that we properly keep all commissioners and the public properly informed.

Thanks

Matt Ready

9:50 AM - Mike Glenn to Matt Ready (cc: Jill Buhler)

Hi Matt-

Kees asked to meet w/Pranav to provide feedback. He asked for a draft of the proposal, which was an early work in progress.

We are scrambling to complete the 50+ page document to meet today's 3:00 deadline. It is being piecemealed together by the entire SLG team.

The proposal asked repeatedly about our financial investment, like purchasing and leasing assets, which may/may not be part of our proposal.

Our plan is to share the end product to the entire board immediately after we submi...