🏛️ The Constitutional Tightrope Walk

🌟 Imagine you're a judge facing this dilemma: A centuries-old religious practice clearly violates someone's fundamental rights. Do you respect religious freedom or enforce constitutional equality? This is the daily reality of Indian courts!

💡 What You'll Discover:

• 🔍 How Articles 25-26 (religious freedom) clash with Articles 14-15 (equality rights)
• ⚖️ The revolutionary "manifestly arbitrary" test that's reshaping personal laws
• 🎯 Why judges walk a tightrope between judicial restraint and activism
• 📜 Article 44's vision for a Uniform Civil Code - dream or reality?

🚀 Landmark Case Discussed:

• 💎 Shayra Bano vs. Union of India - The triple talaq case that shattered old assumptions about personal law immunity
• ⭐ How this case proved that even religious practices can be struck down if they're "manifestly arbitrary"

🧠 The Big Questions:

• 🤔 Should courts actively reform society or wait for Parliament?
• ⚡ Can personal laws hide behind religion when they violate basic rights?
• 🏗️ Is India ready for one law for all citizens regardless of religion?

🎙️ This isn't just legal theory - it affects millions of lives daily. By the end, you'll understand the delicate balance between tradition and constitutional rights that shapes modern India!