
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Editorial Note: This segment is being posted individually in light of the recent Epstein Files release (February 2026). The 3+ million pages of documents released by the DOJ have renewed public interest in elite power networks, connections between wealthy individuals and accused perpetrators, and patterns of institutional protection. Many themes discussed in this January 2025 podcast segment—elite networks, art world connections, media dismissal of inquiry, and the question of how power protects power—directly parallel revelations emerging from the Epstein documents. This analysis provides historical context for understanding those connections.
The Three Hour Pizzagate segment from the January 19, 2025 episode of "This Dum Week." The hosts provide a comprehensive historical exploration of the story's origins, key players, documented connections, and why the "conspiracy theory" dismissal may have prevented legitimate inquiry.
Important Preface: The hosts explicitly state this is NOT an investigation claiming to prove criminal activity. Rather, it examines why the story had more substance and legitimate questions than the dismissive "conspiracy theory" label suggests.
John Podesta's Background:
The Andrew Breitbart Time Bomb:
"How prog guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover upper defending unspeakable dregs escapes me."
This tweet sat dormant until the 2016 Podesta email leaks gave it new context. The hosts note this creates a central question: Either Breitbart was wildly speculating and happened to tweet something that later connections would make seem prescient, he knew something and was using his platform to create a record, or he was engaged in defamation that should have brought consequences. The lack of exploration of any of these possibilities is itself telling.
Breitbart's Tactics:
This "bait the adversary" approach was specifically designed to counter Podesta's own "deny and attack the messenger" strategy from the Clinton era.
The Case:
Axel Vervoordt:
Who is Marina Abramovic:
The Leaked Email:
"November 6-22: Proportio, curated by Axel Vervoordt"
This directly connects:
The hosts emphasize: this is a documented connection in leaked emails, not speculation.
Washington Life Magazine Profile (2015):
Key Quote from the Profile:
"If you've ever dreamed of strolling through a museum with a slice of pizza and a glass of wine in hand, you need to befriend super lobbyist Tony Podesta."
Biljana Djurdjevic's Art:
Tony Podesta owns multiple works from this series and displays them prominently in his home where he hosts parties. The hosts show some of these images, which depict children in positions and settings strongly evocative of abuse.
Who is James Alefantis:
The Hosts Emphasize:
"We are not talking about some immigrant family that has a pizza place... A poor person caught up in nothing. They have absolutely no stake in the game. They have nothing important to just a bystander getting swept up in an Internet frenzy. Totally different than a person who's really well connected."
The Instagram Evidence:
Hosts' Analysis:
"Sort of morbid humor. Yeah, it's fine. I make morbid jokes decently, frequently. But when you have the same one recurring and you keep referring to the place that you work as having kill rooms and things like that, it gets a little sketchy."
The Sex Stains Band:
The Venue's Atmosphere:
The Network:
Alefantis uses his art connections and pizza parties at Tony Podesta's house to maintain his position as one of DC's power players, despite being a pizza restaurant owner - an unusual position for someone on the "50 most powerful" list.
The Gun Incident:
The Media Response:
What the Hosts Are NOT Claiming:
What the Hosts ARE Showing:
Andrew Breitbart's Tweet (February 2011):
"How prog guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover upper defending unspeakable dregs escapes me."
On James Alefantis's Position:
"We are not talking about some immigrant family that has a pizza place... A poor person caught up in nothing. They have absolutely no stake in the game. They have nothing important to just a bystander getting swept up in an Internet frenzy. Totally different than a person who's really well connected."
On Tony Podesta's Art Shows:
"If you've ever dreamed of strolling through a museum with a slice of pizza and a glass of wine in hand, you need to befriend super lobbyist Tony Podesta."
On the Kill Room Jokes:
"Sort of morbid humor. Yeah, it's fine. I make morbid jokes decently, frequently. But when you have the same one recurring and you keep referring to the place that you work as having kill rooms and things like that, it gets a little sketchy."
Andrew Breitbart on John Podesta (from earlier segment):
"John Podesta, who is my mortal enemy. This guy runs ThinkProgress... This was all an attempt. The strategy in the first weekend was to try and say if we attacked Breitbart, then by the time we get to Tuesday, it will no longer be there."
The Pizzagate segment (approximately 1:40:00 - 3:30:00) follows a methodical structure:
The hosts demonstrate:
A significant insight is how high-end art serves as:
The connection between Podesta, Abramovic, Alefantis, and Vervoordt isn't primarily through pizza or politics - it's through the art world. This provides plausible explanations for associations while also raising questions about shared values and aesthetics.
The Pizzagate story demonstrates why "just asking questions" gets such a strong reaction. When you have:
Even asking questions gets labeled "conspiracy theory" because engaging with the questions legitimizes the inquiry.
The Comet Ping Pong Instagram posts present a challenge for both sides:
For Dismissers:
For Believers:
The hosts' position: These posts, combined with everything else, warranted investigation rather than dismissal. The fact that asking questions was immediately labeled conspiracy theory prevented any serious examination.
The hosts note:
The pizza connection came from:
The unfortunate name made it easier to dismiss - "you think there's a pedophile ring in a pizza restaurant basement?" - when the actual concerning elements had nothing to do with pizza.
The themes explored in this January 2025 segment have taken on renewed significance following the February 2026 Epstein Files release:
Parallel Patterns:
Key Differences:
The Broader Question:
The Pizzagate segment doesn't claim to solve mysteries or prove crimes. Instead, it documents that:
The Central Question:
The Breitbart Mystery:
The Takeaway:
By drrollergatorEditorial Note: This segment is being posted individually in light of the recent Epstein Files release (February 2026). The 3+ million pages of documents released by the DOJ have renewed public interest in elite power networks, connections between wealthy individuals and accused perpetrators, and patterns of institutional protection. Many themes discussed in this January 2025 podcast segment—elite networks, art world connections, media dismissal of inquiry, and the question of how power protects power—directly parallel revelations emerging from the Epstein documents. This analysis provides historical context for understanding those connections.
The Three Hour Pizzagate segment from the January 19, 2025 episode of "This Dum Week." The hosts provide a comprehensive historical exploration of the story's origins, key players, documented connections, and why the "conspiracy theory" dismissal may have prevented legitimate inquiry.
Important Preface: The hosts explicitly state this is NOT an investigation claiming to prove criminal activity. Rather, it examines why the story had more substance and legitimate questions than the dismissive "conspiracy theory" label suggests.
John Podesta's Background:
The Andrew Breitbart Time Bomb:
"How prog guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover upper defending unspeakable dregs escapes me."
This tweet sat dormant until the 2016 Podesta email leaks gave it new context. The hosts note this creates a central question: Either Breitbart was wildly speculating and happened to tweet something that later connections would make seem prescient, he knew something and was using his platform to create a record, or he was engaged in defamation that should have brought consequences. The lack of exploration of any of these possibilities is itself telling.
Breitbart's Tactics:
This "bait the adversary" approach was specifically designed to counter Podesta's own "deny and attack the messenger" strategy from the Clinton era.
The Case:
Axel Vervoordt:
Who is Marina Abramovic:
The Leaked Email:
"November 6-22: Proportio, curated by Axel Vervoordt"
This directly connects:
The hosts emphasize: this is a documented connection in leaked emails, not speculation.
Washington Life Magazine Profile (2015):
Key Quote from the Profile:
"If you've ever dreamed of strolling through a museum with a slice of pizza and a glass of wine in hand, you need to befriend super lobbyist Tony Podesta."
Biljana Djurdjevic's Art:
Tony Podesta owns multiple works from this series and displays them prominently in his home where he hosts parties. The hosts show some of these images, which depict children in positions and settings strongly evocative of abuse.
Who is James Alefantis:
The Hosts Emphasize:
"We are not talking about some immigrant family that has a pizza place... A poor person caught up in nothing. They have absolutely no stake in the game. They have nothing important to just a bystander getting swept up in an Internet frenzy. Totally different than a person who's really well connected."
The Instagram Evidence:
Hosts' Analysis:
"Sort of morbid humor. Yeah, it's fine. I make morbid jokes decently, frequently. But when you have the same one recurring and you keep referring to the place that you work as having kill rooms and things like that, it gets a little sketchy."
The Sex Stains Band:
The Venue's Atmosphere:
The Network:
Alefantis uses his art connections and pizza parties at Tony Podesta's house to maintain his position as one of DC's power players, despite being a pizza restaurant owner - an unusual position for someone on the "50 most powerful" list.
The Gun Incident:
The Media Response:
What the Hosts Are NOT Claiming:
What the Hosts ARE Showing:
Andrew Breitbart's Tweet (February 2011):
"How prog guru John Podesta isn't household name as world class underage sex slave op cover upper defending unspeakable dregs escapes me."
On James Alefantis's Position:
"We are not talking about some immigrant family that has a pizza place... A poor person caught up in nothing. They have absolutely no stake in the game. They have nothing important to just a bystander getting swept up in an Internet frenzy. Totally different than a person who's really well connected."
On Tony Podesta's Art Shows:
"If you've ever dreamed of strolling through a museum with a slice of pizza and a glass of wine in hand, you need to befriend super lobbyist Tony Podesta."
On the Kill Room Jokes:
"Sort of morbid humor. Yeah, it's fine. I make morbid jokes decently, frequently. But when you have the same one recurring and you keep referring to the place that you work as having kill rooms and things like that, it gets a little sketchy."
Andrew Breitbart on John Podesta (from earlier segment):
"John Podesta, who is my mortal enemy. This guy runs ThinkProgress... This was all an attempt. The strategy in the first weekend was to try and say if we attacked Breitbart, then by the time we get to Tuesday, it will no longer be there."
The Pizzagate segment (approximately 1:40:00 - 3:30:00) follows a methodical structure:
The hosts demonstrate:
A significant insight is how high-end art serves as:
The connection between Podesta, Abramovic, Alefantis, and Vervoordt isn't primarily through pizza or politics - it's through the art world. This provides plausible explanations for associations while also raising questions about shared values and aesthetics.
The Pizzagate story demonstrates why "just asking questions" gets such a strong reaction. When you have:
Even asking questions gets labeled "conspiracy theory" because engaging with the questions legitimizes the inquiry.
The Comet Ping Pong Instagram posts present a challenge for both sides:
For Dismissers:
For Believers:
The hosts' position: These posts, combined with everything else, warranted investigation rather than dismissal. The fact that asking questions was immediately labeled conspiracy theory prevented any serious examination.
The hosts note:
The pizza connection came from:
The unfortunate name made it easier to dismiss - "you think there's a pedophile ring in a pizza restaurant basement?" - when the actual concerning elements had nothing to do with pizza.
The themes explored in this January 2025 segment have taken on renewed significance following the February 2026 Epstein Files release:
Parallel Patterns:
Key Differences:
The Broader Question:
The Pizzagate segment doesn't claim to solve mysteries or prove crimes. Instead, it documents that:
The Central Question:
The Breitbart Mystery:
The Takeaway: