Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Plastics: If It's BPA-Free, Does It Mean Toxic-Free?_TSCL#010
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Plastics: If It's BPA-Free, Does It Mean Toxic-Free?_TSCL#010
Introduction
Welcome to this episode of The Sense Check Lab, where we dig beneath the surface of everyday assumptions and challenge the claims that shape our choices. Today, we’re tackling a topic that touches nearly every household: BPA-free plastics. Are these alternatives truly safer, or are we just swapping one risk for another? From water bottles to food containers, plastics are everywhere—but what’s really in them, and how much should we trust the “BPA-free” label? Join us as we break down the science, the marketing, and the real risks behind plastic safety.
Disclaimer
The information presented in this episode is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended as medical, legal, or professional advice. While we strive to provide accurate, up-to-date information based on reputable sources, listeners should consult qualified professionals or relevant authorities for guidance tailored to their individual circumstances. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect those of any regulatory agency or institution.
References
National Geographic: Explores the safety of BPA-free plastics and highlights research showing that alternatives like BPS can also leach from plastics and may be just as harmful as BPA.
Phys.org: Reports on a study indicating that BPA alternatives, specifically BPF and BPS, may still pose health risks by disrupting endocrine function and potentially causing diseases like obesity and diabetes.
The New York Times: Details the health risks associated with phthalates, another class of chemicals commonly found in plastics, including their links to metabolic disorders, reproductive health issues, and cardiovascular disease.
U.S. EPA: Summarizes current scientific understanding of PFAS (“forever chemicals”), their widespread use in plastics, and their links to cancer, reproductive effects, immune system impacts, and more.
European Environment Agency: Discusses microplastics as an emerging pollutant, their ubiquity in the environment and food chain, and the potential for chemical and biological agents within microplastics to harm human health.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): Details the regulatory history of BPA in the EU, including bans and stricter limits based on updated risk assessments, and the ongoing evaluation of bisphenols in food contact materials.
Lab Manager: Cites research from the University of Missouri showing that BPS, a BPA alternative, can negatively affect the placenta and developing brain in animal models, raising concerns about the safety of BPA-free products.
Chris Kresser: Reviews evidence that BPA-free plastics often contain other chemicals (such as BPS and TPP) with estrogenic or endocrine-disrupting effects, and criticizes regulatory gaps in the approval of these alternatives.
View all episodes
By UYUL MEDIAIntroduction
Welcome to this episode of The Sense Check Lab, where we dig beneath the surface of everyday assumptions and challenge the claims that shape our choices. Today, we’re tackling a topic that touches nearly every household: BPA-free plastics. Are these alternatives truly safer, or are we just swapping one risk for another? From water bottles to food containers, plastics are everywhere—but what’s really in them, and how much should we trust the “BPA-free” label? Join us as we break down the science, the marketing, and the real risks behind plastic safety.
Disclaimer
The information presented in this episode is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended as medical, legal, or professional advice. While we strive to provide accurate, up-to-date information based on reputable sources, listeners should consult qualified professionals or relevant authorities for guidance tailored to their individual circumstances. The views expressed in this podcast are those of the hosts and guests and do not necessarily reflect those of any regulatory agency or institution.
References
National Geographic: Explores the safety of BPA-free plastics and highlights research showing that alternatives like BPS can also leach from plastics and may be just as harmful as BPA.
Phys.org: Reports on a study indicating that BPA alternatives, specifically BPF and BPS, may still pose health risks by disrupting endocrine function and potentially causing diseases like obesity and diabetes.
The New York Times: Details the health risks associated with phthalates, another class of chemicals commonly found in plastics, including their links to metabolic disorders, reproductive health issues, and cardiovascular disease.
U.S. EPA: Summarizes current scientific understanding of PFAS (“forever chemicals”), their widespread use in plastics, and their links to cancer, reproductive effects, immune system impacts, and more.
European Environment Agency: Discusses microplastics as an emerging pollutant, their ubiquity in the environment and food chain, and the potential for chemical and biological agents within microplastics to harm human health.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA): Details the regulatory history of BPA in the EU, including bans and stricter limits based on updated risk assessments, and the ongoing evaluation of bisphenols in food contact materials.
Lab Manager: Cites research from the University of Missouri showing that BPS, a BPA alternative, can negatively affect the placenta and developing brain in animal models, raising concerns about the safety of BPA-free products.
Chris Kresser: Reviews evidence that BPA-free plastics often contain other chemicals (such as BPS and TPP) with estrogenic or endocrine-disrupting effects, and criticizes regulatory gaps in the approval of these alternatives.