Another throwback debate that still challenges how we think about hiring, and ourselves Is accepting a job that one is under qualified for a disaster in the making?

That was the focus of the motion from a few years ago. The more I listen to this episode of the PM Debate Podcast, the more I realize this isn’t just a hiring question. It’s a leadership question, a self-awareness question, and a career-defining decision.

The Tension

On one side if you step into a role you’re not ready for, you risk everything.

* Losing the trust of your team

* Failing to deliver when it matters most

* Damaging your credibility before you’ve even built it

In project environments where timelines, budgets, and outcomes matter that risk is real.

On the other side if you only take roles you’re fully qualified for you

* You stop growing and stay in the shallow end.

* You repeat what you already know.

* You miss the very opportunities that shape your career.

The Line That Still Hits

Early in my career, I used to ask hiring managers:

“Do you want someone with one year of experience repeated fifteen times… or someone who actually knows how to do the job?”

It worked, but looking back (I’ll be honest) that confidence came with risk. Sometimes it worked because I grew into the role, sometimes it worked because I got lucky. That’s the part we don’t talk about enough.

The Real Question

This isn’t about being 100% qualified, after all, no one is. The real question is:

Are you stretching or are you stepping in over your head?

There’s a difference.

Three Checks Before You Say Yes

If you’re considering a role that feels like a stretch, ask yourself:

* Will this team trust me enough to follow me?

* Can I actually deliver what this role demands?

* Will leadership believe in me when things get tough?

If the answer to any of these is no, you’re probably going beyond stretching yourself to gambling with the role or relying a bit too much on luck.

What This Means for Hiring

Hiring managers face the same dilemma. We often wonder if we should play it safe and hire that fully qualified candidate or take a chance on someone who could become exceptional. The problem is most systems are built to filter out potential before it ever gets a chance.

Final Thought

The best careers aren’t built by playing it safe, but they’re also not built on blind risk. Success in a role and in a career is built in that uncomfortable space between where you’re not quite ready but you’re ready enough.

Project Management Matters is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Get full access to Project Management Matters at philipdiab.substack.com/subscribe